The Market Ticker - Canceled
What 'They' Don't Want Published- Category [Corruption]
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2021-10-10 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Corruption , 3218 references
[Comments enabled]  

... why are you still willing to put up with the bull**** surrounding Covid-19 in any form whatsoever?

Fun fact: Between 100-200 United States Congress Members (plus many of their staffers & family members) with COVID.. were treated by a colleague over the past 15 months with ivermectin & the I-MASK+ protocol at None have gone to hospital. Just sayin'

There are 535 members of Congress.  On the lower boundary this is 19% of the members, plus staff and family or close to one in five.  On the upper boundary it is more than a third.

Remember folks that doctors have been threatened with loss of their medical licenses for writing prescriptions and chain pharmacies, which are most of them, have in many cases refused to fill said prescriptions.  The entire reason people have gone out and bought "pony paste" is that they can't go to the local doc-in-a-box and get a script for Ivermectin.

Incidentally I trust animal meds in this sort of context far more than human ones.  Go kill someone's tens-of-millions of dollar racehorse and see how long you live.  Whack Fluffy and it will be all over the news for a week with the responsible vet run out of town.  But killing Granny, if you're a hospital and can come up with a positive PCR test you get a $33,000 bounty -- and everyone, including the media, yawns.

Do I believe Ivermectin is the entire answer?  No.  It wasn't for me, and I used it when I got Covid in early August.  But was it part of the answer?  I believe it was.  It certainly didn't kill me and on the data it is about 100 times safer than Tylenol.  We have 40 years of data on its safety and it has a risk of seriously harming you of about 1 in 600,000.  With close to four billion human doses dispensed and consumed that data is pretty solid; I certainly trust it.

Can you OD on it or worse, find some product that has it and other things in it too and those other drugs are unsafe (or at least untested) in humans?  Certainly.  But remember folks: We had an out-and-out fraud, a actual medical practitioner, who stated their entire ER was full of people who poisoned themselves with the drug.  The hospital, a day or two later when they realized they had been named, issued a formal statement that exactly zero persons had shown up in their Emergency Room having been poisoned by self-administration of Ivermectin.

Did anyone go to prison for this lie?  Nope.  Did that person's medical ticket get punched permanently for their false presentation?  Nope.  What sanction was placed on said person for their intentional fraud?  None.

Is Covid serious?  It certainly can be.  While there are predictors of increased risk the fact is that just as with any drug who gets hammered and who does not is not certain.  I used a prophylactic protocol for close to a year and a half and despite somewhere around two dozen known exposures I did not get the virus.  I was still using that protocol when I finally did get the virus via an exposure that was close enough to get me, but was hardly as close as many of the others.  I also was under a serious immune assault due to a yellowjacket swarm during the incubation period; without that I might well have once again avoided infection.  There's no way for me to know that with any degree of certainty.

But as with every other viral disease known to mankind contracting the disease and fighting it off produces strong immunity.  This one is no exception.  We have never jabbed people who got a viral disease in the past; it is medically stupid and no doctor will do it because it is the definition of malpractice to give someone a drug, all of which have risk, without any possibility of a benefit.  No doctor will give you a chicken pox or measles shot if you've had the diseases.

People like to talk about the flu shot but the flu shot is in fact different every year because we have to guess what flu strains will circulate in a given year.  Nonetheless if you had a given strain and got hammered by it the odds of getting hammered by the same strain a second time are vanishingly small.  Not zero, but very small -- even years later.  H1N1, the 1918 pandemic flu, faded off into obscurity within a couple of years.  Did it disappear?  No; people who had it and didn't die kept getting re-challenged, some of them got sick but statistically speaking nobody got very sick or was killed by it after the first time around.  I remind you that H1N1 came around in both the 2009 and 2019/2020 flu seasons, was not in the shot, and made plenty of people real sick -- including me the first week of January 2020.  How many people in the first "surge" of Covid were co-infected with H1N1 influenza yet their death was "credited" to Covid?  We'll never know but the number is likely very large since there was a bounty for toe tags with Covid on them but none if the cause was listed as H1N1 influenza.  That was a nasty flu too; my personal experience with it was more-severe than Delta Covid in August of 2021!

OC43, another beta coronavirus in the same family as Covid-19, is believed to have caused a pandemic in the 1890s.  Today it circulates and causes colds.  Occasionally, particularly in old people, it nails them hard and kills them through mechanisms that look an awful lot like Covid.  Why?  Because as you get old your immune response wanes and so their former exposure, which probably dates back to their childhood and then is enhanced by repeated challenges, becomes insufficient.

Treating people to improve survival rates produces a group of people with robust, durable immunity.  You can't eradicate Covid as it has animal reservoirs; it is with us forever.  You want people to acquire durable immunity and you want them to be re-challenged and further reinforce that immunity.  The jabs do the exact opposite on the data; they give you temporary protection but when it wanes, and the data is that it does so within six months, you get ****ed as if you never had any protection at all or even worse, the jabs may be enhancing disease at that point.

If in fact Congress, their staff and families have been using the very process I just described while screwing everyone else by banning it either explicitly or implicitly then they are all murderous *******s

Exactly why does the public allow such abject fraud to be run upon them?  We're all used to lies out of Congress and the Executive; that's what they do best.

But now we have an allegation that with these lies they're killing Americans -- literally -- by arguing against and permitting outright bans on the use of the very intervention they themselves are using to beat back this virus.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)

If it's a "federal offense" to get verbally aggressive with school board members why hasn't the very public and outrageous aggression -- in a woman's bathroom no less -- against Sinema resulted in federal indictments?

Yeah, I read your "memo."

I will note for the peanut gallery that selective prosecution on the basis of political expression is wildly illegal.  Not that this has stopped various administrations and sub-units of it (e.g. the FBI, etc) in the past.  Indeed it's a raging insult that Hoover, who was one of the most-offensive in this regard, has the FBI building named after him.

Hoover was a screaming racist and first director of the FBI, not leaving until 1972 when he died.  He, along with many others, engaged in systemic and highly illegal harassment, surveillance and in some cases prosecution of political opponents.  COINTELPRO anyone?

May I remind you that the FBI financed and armed an extreme right-wing group that targeted various groups with both harassment and violence?

Yeah, this sort of crap isn't new.

Nor is CNN cheering it on, arguably becoming an accomplice after the fact.

What's old is new again, only the names of the targets ever change, and we even lionize the most-abusive *******s to ever hold an office by putting their ****ing names on buildings.

PS: Can we apply the same rules of engagement to Fauci and Rochelle at the CDC that were applied to Sinema?  You already know the answer, I assume.

PPS: Oh look what the cat dragged in..... Oh Congress!  Oh Corruption! Oh 42 USC 1983!  Oh, WHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS.....  Oh, this is not just cited on CTH either..  What is abusing the office of Attorney General to protect a private enterprise from the consequences of lawful 1st Amendment activity?  Is that not a serious federal crime?

Attorney General Merrick Garland’s daughter is Rebecca Garland.  In 2018 Rebecca Garland married Xan Tanner [LINK].  Mr. Xan Tanner is the current co-founder of a controversial education service company called Panorama Education. [LINK and LINK]  Panorama Education is the “social learning” resource material provider to school districts and teachers that teach Critical Race Theory.  (Ed: Guess who, it is alleged, provided "start-up" funding for that now-unlawfully-protected "enterprise"?)

View this entry with comments (opens new window)

2021-10-05 12:59 by Karl Denninger
in Corruption , 950 references
[Comments enabled]  

Hint: You just destroyed, permanently, any claim to your personal medical privacy.

Some states have laws about "private facts" and the USSC has repeatedly found that such a right exists with regards to one's medical status (e.g. Roe) but to be a private fact it must be reasonably treated as private by you.

Note that for a private fact to exist it must be private.  There is an exception in the law for things that are newsworthy and of legitimate public concern but absent that medical status is one of the areas where this law is routinely upheld.

If you make known to others without a legal duty of confidentiality that you are HIV+, for example, you cannot sue if someone discloses that because it's not private anymore.  Once you willingly make something public by your own actions it is not possible to return that item of information to the status of a private fact.

There are things that we remove from the status of "private facts" willingly and by our own hand.  Our true identity, for one.  You flash a driver license to prove you're 21 at a bar, for example.  Said bar has zero duty of confidentiality to you.  There are all manner of places where such is requested and we willingly comply.  By doing so we waive the private fact nature of that information since we willingly and intentionally display it in public.

If you go to a professional conference, for example, and flash a vax card or a digital app QR code at the door to "attest" that you had a Covid-19 vaccination you have released that information to people who have no duty in law or by contract to keep that information private.  Said app developer and owner has no legal stricture requiring said privacy either.  Further, by definition your mere presence in such a place, if such a pass is required for entry, voluntarily discloses your medical status to thousands of others! 

Again: Your mere presence in a business -- any business -- that requires such at the door waives your private fact protection.

I remind you that anyone can photograph you from or in a public place.  Never mind that damn near everywhere such is happening all the time in public anyway; there's a camera behind the bar in the restaurant, three more in the dining area, etc.  If you're walking down the street these days your next door neighbor probably has a camera on their doorbell and you were in a public place, namely, the street.

The minute you consent to a requirement for your medical status in some regard to be in a place open to the public you have, by definition and your own hand, destroyed any claim now or in the future that such is a private fact.

Thus you have now consented to your employer requiring you to document same since you already have made your Covid vaccination status available to the public on an unrestricted basis.  If and when something related to that (e.g. whether you have taken the sixth booster two years from now) is required of you you have already consented to that disclosure and discrimination because you, by your own hand, voluntarily gave up all right of privacy in that regard and consented to be discriminated  against.

Note that prior to Covid-19 there was exactly zero such attempt made.  Oh, people say, but the schools required vaccinations for kids.  Ah, but said entities were government agencies and had strict protocols for medical privacy.  Further, there were plenty of kids who didn't have all those shots in the school -- but nobody knew who they were.  If you had an exemption on whatever basis that was nobody else's business and exactly nobody had access to those records.  Finally, I attended college briefly in the 1980s (and took some classes while in High School too at a different college) and was never asked for a single bit of medical documentation before or while doing so.  All they were interested in was money.

Never mind that exactly zero parents were ever required to show anything about themselves to come through said door and pick up or drop off their kid, nor go to a parent-teacher conference, attend a basketball game or similar.  The entire time from the mid 1990s forward I was on school campuses every now and then for various purposes as my daughter was attending there.  Never once was I asked for a single piece of medical information.

Nor have I ever been so much as requested to document what I might have had (or been vaccinated against) to report for work anywhere, and I've been doing various jobs for more than forty years.

You didn't think about any of this, did you?

Well then you were really ****ing stupid to flash that card or show a QR code that instead of forcing said restaurant, conference, show or EMPLOYER to shove their demands up their ass -- and go out of business.

These abuses only stop when you make them stop by whatever means are necessary.  The time to do that was when they were first proposed and if you don't do it now the very first time you present such a "credential" you have given consent and thus you cannot have your privacy rights violated as you willingly gave that information up to the public at-large.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)

2021-09-30 14:50 by Karl Denninger
in Corruption , 30380 references
[Comments enabled]  

Oh, where's my sign again?

During the summer there was a 25 per cent rise in the number of people rushed to the Golden Jubilee National Hospital in Clydebank with partially blocked arteries cutting blood supply to the heart.

C'mon jackasses -- a 25% increase in one year?

You know good and damn well that's not environmental nor is it due to people's lifestyles.  Yes, lifestyle causes this in many cases but it takes decades to get you due to your lifestyle, not months or a year.

What did we change in the subject population less than a year ago, and since this is now happening what leads you to believe it is a one-off?

Oh, this is largely in older people too.  Which is exactly who the US Government, anyway, would like to see take the dirt nap since that cuts down Medicare expenses and, to the extent they wind up in nursing homes later, Medicaid expenses too if they have no money.

Congratulations on increasing your odds of pulling the short straw -- by a lot.

Oh, and how many people have an occlusive heart attack at 42?  Not many.  This guy did -- here in the US.  DVT, heart attack and a PE at 42?  Uh huh.  He's very lucky he's not dead and you and I (along with the physicians involved) both know damn well the likely cause of it too.  If you know anything about the circulation you know that while DVT can cause a PE it cannot cause a heart attack or stroke because the lungs are in the way and an extremely effective filter that prevent that from happening.  Occlusive strokes and heart attacks are caused by clots in the arterial side of the circulation.

Clotshot indeed.


View this entry with comments (opens new window)

2021-04-20 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in Corruption , 3053 references
[Comments enabled]  

Caution: This is a fairly long and graph-heavy article. It also should be read while sitting down and without coffee or other beverages in your mouth where they can destroy things if sprayed all over the room, such as a keyboard or monitor.

Boy, we got problems here folks.

Remember the claim that Covid-19 killed 500,000+ Americans to excess!

Well..... did it?

I have a gift which has served me very well over the decades; it is part of what allows me to be an excellent programmer and data analyst.  I can look at a data set and intuitively know whether it has discontinuities in it and this leads me to be able to partition it up and work with it more-efficiently than most since I then know where to put my attention when it comes to analysis.  Of course I'm not always right when I see something that looks "off" at first, nobody is, but most of the time it proves up.  That same capacity means I can look at an assembly-language dump of a program and rather-quickly among a multi-hundred page green-bar listing hone in on, for example, where a tax rate that needs to be changed is likely stored and then develop and iterate on a very good set of guesses on how an unknown machine's instruction set is likely organized without a processor instruction manual -- and thus determine how to successfully change the reference and/or data.

Let's look at the CDC's own data, which is the organization telling us what happened, and see if we can find such a data discontinuity without using the Covid data claim itself.  That is, let's look at all the other most-common and thus distinctly-reported and highlighted reasons people die according to the CDC and stack 'em up .vs. 2019, which we will use as our control year, during which there was by their claims no Covid and thus which was the most-recent year we can use for reference.

We should be easily able to see the other morbidities we were all told killed people; all those other conditions that were potentiated by Covid.  Remember, according to the CDC only a vanishingly small number of people died with no other cause on their death certificate; ergo, those other causes, if they were not going to occur anyway, will be on the death certificates and materially elevated over the control year.

Indeed the CDC itself says that your base risk of death if you're under 18 is 1/50,000.  This is a very small risk; to put it in perspective the average under 18 person accepts the same risk of death by being present in automobiles over a few months time and accepts it again and again each and every few more months.  So these conditions, which are the ones that kill people often enough to be of special note and thus be individually reported out by the CDC over the last decade or so, are the ones that are most likely to elevate risk from Covid-19 to a degree that is material in overall death statistics.  This is logical, reasonable, and thus can be considered presumptively correct (in other words the presumption is that it's right; you'd have to present a sizeable body of scientific evidence to convince me otherwise.)

I remind you that there is no base risk of substance from this virus absent some other set of morbid conditions; you accept more risk than the virus presents to a healthy person, by a substantial amount, simply going to buy groceries in your car over a period of a few months.

In addition note that the late weeks in this data set are incomplete -- often badly so.  I went on a series of rants last year on my page here when people were saying the current week data said people weren't dying at all.  That's wasn't true then and isn't now; it takes time to get the reports and correlate them.

But it is for this specific reason that when you see indications of a potential signal in data sets like this you damn well better pay attention because by the time the proof is delivered, if you're doing something that can't be retracted, you will have screwed an utterly enormous number of people and there will be nothing you can do about it.

Each of these graphs has its "X" axis of calendar weeks.  The 2020/2021 line extends beyond "52" because it keeps going into the new year but again remember that the closer you get to "today" the greater the under-reporting risk because the data simply hasn't gotten to them yet.  Nonetheless, four months into 2021 we should expect that basically everything for 2020 is in fact complete.  You'll also notice that while a lot of conditions have seasonal curves to them this is not true for all, and the magnitude, where it is present, varies quite a bit.

We will start our analysis of potential comorbid conditions with cancer.  Cancer kills a lot of people.  We were told it was a major co-morbidity for Covid-19; ergo, we should see a serious cancer death increase that happened last year and into this year based on the claims of the CDC and others.


Huh?  How come there's no material change of any sort when it comes to the rate of cancer death in the age of Covid?  Total additional deaths were 10,928 out of 609,000.  That's statistically non-existent; a 2% increase is very-likely simply associated with our well-established demographic shift toward getting older.  If cancer makes you more-likely to die from Covid the elevation in risk is quite small -- statistically speaking it doesn't do much to make Covid-19 more deadly.

Ok, ok, sepsis was allegedly one of the ways that Covid kills you; multiple-organ failure due to septic shock.  Therefore there should be a really, really big increase in sepsis over the previous 2019 year, right?


Ok, there was a very small increase - 2,470 deaths, a six percent increase.  That's a fairly significant increase in percentage terms but the total number of people who die from this cause, in whole or part, is quite small.  The original weeks, when we didn't know much of anything about Covid-19, gave us a pretty big spike; about 15% over what it was the previous year, but then it settled down and, while there was a burst of associated death in the summer that was quickly attenuated too.  It appears our medical system figured out how to stop sepsis from being a major factor pretty quickly and we stopped people that had The Coof from dying, in part, from sepsis. That doesn't account for the problem.

Moving on how about my favorite one..... fat-ass disease.  You know, Dieeeeeebeeeetus, otherwise known for most people as you keep eating **** for decades and it eventually kills you.  Yeah, virtue-signaling, "healthy at any size" bull**** disease?  Yes, I know, a small (under 10%) percentage of people with diabetes are Type I and that's not their fault in any way; Type I is an autoimmune disorder and while you may choose not to manage it other than by chasing carbs with insulin the actual cause isn't something you did.  But Type II is, in the main caused by being a fat-ass, which is 100% voluntary and a decision you can change at any point.


Oh look!  The blue line is above the red line, and materially so!  In fact in the spring it was really nasty, good for about 700 extra deaths in one week, and it's been 300 or so on average since.  That's fairly significant but, 300 deaths a week x 52 weeks is... 15,712 corpses or a 15% increase over 2019 levels.  Hmmm...... ok, we found some of it but for 90% of the people with the condition it's a lifestyle choice and not my concern nor is it any of my responsibility to mitigate your increased level of risk if you make said choice.

Next up is Alzheimer's.  You would not expect Covid-19 to have anything to do with that, but forcing people into isolation who are progressively becoming more-compromised both mentally and physically damn well might, essentially killing them through neglect and "I don't give a **** about you" style prison treatment.  We didn't do any of that, did we?


Covid-19 didn't kill those people, our governments, our mayors, both Presidents and we did.  We're bastards and we slaughtered innocent old people through intentional neglect because we refused to implement isolation protocols for the workers in the facilities and find ways for those who loved and care for these older Americans to have said care, comfort and contact with their loved ones.  We're monsters and they died as a result of us, not from a virus.  But even so.... it doesn't account for anywhere near the rest of the dead people.  Every one of them is sad, but it is what it is.  This accounts for 14,567 additional dead bodies, an 11% increase.  Some of that is also likely demographics but you can bet we murdered some of those folks -- we just didn't do it with a virus.

Next up -- Influenza!  You know, our old buddy the flu?  Remember, we were told the flu "disappeared."  Did it?


Heh wait a minute..... there were lots of flu deaths in 2020 weren't there?  In fact it was only a bit below baseline this year so far, although in 2021 it looks to be running low.  Then again, was I noted, beware the latest weeks; they're behind, so I can't draw any firm conclusions.  But this much is clear: Did Covid-19 actually kill those people in those other weeks or did the flu kill them?  Good question; remember that dying with something doesn't mean you died of something.  Did we autopsy those people to find out which was which?  You know damn well we did not and the two are quite-closely related.  The total?  5,095 additional dead bodies, a 9% increase.

How about COPD/Emphysema and related things?  You'd think those folks would have gotten hammered.  After all, someone with either condition has severely-compromised oxygen transport to start with because their lungs are screwed, and we know that people choke to death with Covid, right?  So sufferers of both diseases should have gotten it straight up the pooper and fallen like flies.


Wait, WUT?

The death rate from these two diseases in the spring and early summer tracked below 2019?  And then again as we went into the winter "death season" from Covid, again, it tracked materially below the baseline?  Would someone care to explain this one?  Indeed, there were 1,965 fewer deaths, a 1.27% decrease.  Since when is COPD, emphysema and other related lung disorders protective against a respiratory virus?

I'll answer that for you -- when they're using inhaled steroids like Budesonide and those drugs stop the virus from causing serious harm.  So tell me again why we haven't been handing that out to people who get Covid at the first sign of trouble, given that one of the obvious highest-risk groups of people died less often over the last year despite a raging pandemic respiratory virus circulating everywhere?  Gee, wouldn't it have been nice if we used the data we already had via natural experiment across roughly 20 million Americans with an extreme morbidity bearing on respiratory infection to stop people from being killed?  We had this data before the fall and winter surge and deliberately refused to use it.  Indeed it was that data that prompted the Australian-led study which we refused to sign onto and promote here in the US.

I remind you that if we had done so, and handing that readily-available drug out to anyone testing Covid positive had stopped the death equally as well as it did in the COPD/Emphysema group all of the EUAs would have been illegal to issue and there would be no vaccines or need for them as the death toll would have returned to baseline or below immediately and permanently and the pandemic would have been over.  This was an intentional decision as the data was right under everyone's nose all the way back to the summer months of 2020 including Fauci, Azar, the FDA and the staff of the CDC.

I know, I know!  We must have misclassified a bunch of people and they're in the "other respiratory disease" bucket!  That is definitely where the excess death showed up.  It has to be; this is a respiratory virus and so that only makes sense.  Whew, we found it!


Uh, well, maybe not.  There were only 1,838 more dead people in that classification, a 4% increase.  Meh.

Ok, ok, I know, I know, seriously immune compromised people, such as those with Lupus, all dropped like flies.  Remember, that's a serious comorbidity too according to..... everyone who is a so-called expert.  So all those people died.


Oh wait.... they're not dead at rates higher than were seen in 2019?  WTF?  Heh, wait a minute -- aren't most of those people taking Plaquenil?  You do know what Plaquenil is, right?  Hydroxychloroquine, otherwise known as HCQ.  You have to wonder; there's exactly zero evidence that Covid nailed them at all and most of them are in fact using that eeee-viile drug that the CDC, FDA and Pharma all say doesn't work.  Well if it doesn't work and being immune compromised is a risk factor how come there is nearly zero excess death among those people?  Either being immune compromised is not a comorbidity or HCQ looks to be pretty damned protective of people with a serious comorbidity.  Duh.  Yes, there were 1,818 more dead people.  Count 'em folks, they did not drop like flies; that resulted in only a 3% increase for a condition that was expected to be a death sentence if infected by Covid-19.

The most-likely explanation for their lack of death is the drug a huge percentage of them are using.

That would be two drugs now validated by natural experiment and intentionally ignored by all of these goons eh?

All right, all right, I know, I know..... heart attacks got lots of people.  It's gotta show up somewhere; it must be heart attacks.


Hmmmm.... yes, there was a really, really ugly spike in the first few weeks wasn't there?  About 3,000 of them one week, which is really awful.  That, times 53 weeks, would be..... about 150,000 corpses.  Except.... it didn't stay that bad, did it?  No, but it was elevated, and materially-so over the entire year.  This is problematic though because it goes to what I was talking about the science now saying that spike protein itself is pathogenic, and in the form of causing blood clots.  Clots, of course, cause heart attacks and then the question will become are the vaccines going to cause lots of heart attacks too?  Better keep an eye on this one because that elevation level is very material, unlike all the rest of them we've seen so far.  And here we have real death: to be specific, 47,973 more corpses resulting in a 7% increase, so whatever those folks are taking it sure didn't help.  THAT is an ugly number especially considering that heart disease is already up there with the worst of the "why you died" list.

Let's talk strokes; they're nasty too in the general sense.  So did they take a similar hit?


Uh, yeah they did.  A couple hundred extra dead people a week is nothing to sneeze at and also bears watching in the coming months because once again you can't tell much about the most-recent weeks yet.... or can you?  In 2020 we did have 12,404 more fatal strokes and that too is an ugly number of slightly larger magnitude in percentage terms than for heart attacks, an 8% increase.

What's the common thread between heart attacks and strokes?  Clotting.

And finally, the "aw crap we don't know what it was" column:


Ummmm.... Yeah.

Note that in 2020 this accounted for a grand total of 9,635 more bodies.  But in 2021, well.....

Now a good amount of that disappears back into the other classifications over time, so setting off nuclear alarm sirens isn't quite called for yet.  But anyone who tells you that there's no safety signal when you have a very large spike that is now nearly four months old and unresolved into other cataloged conditions has rocks in their head.  That's just flat-out bull**** considering that we now have over a year's worth of experience with Covid-19.

Yes, there's backlog, there's late reporting and there's updated reports that come in over time.  All true and maybe that finding will all disappear back into the other charts over the next six months or so.  But by God it had better, because if it does not and the so-called "authorities" ignore it there's your evidence, correlated exactly with when we started stabbing people en-masse, that people were dying of those stabs and if it continues then the presumptive linked causal factor is going to be established since there is no other material "unknown" that has materially changed during that time period.

I still can't find 500,000 excess deaths caused by Covid in 2020; they're simply not there among the diseases the CDC reported out and since the base risk is 1/50,000 even across half the population being infected we could only account for 3,000 deaths.  It is thus clear that if in fact Covid-19 has killed anywhere near the number of people claimed those other morbid conditions, all of which are serious diseases standing alone, have to account for the increase between them.

Indeed the most-common, by far (40% of additional deaths by disease) were due to heart attacks and the next was diabetes at 13%.  Between diabetes and heart attacks, both almost-exclusively due to lifestyle choices and thus your personal decisions, 53% of the excess 120,475 deaths are accounted for.  If we add in strokes, which also are largely lifestyle-related then we're at about 2/3rds.

Among those diseases that are allegedly "the biggest comorbid factors" I can find only 120,475 more deaths that Covid-19 may have contributed to and which included those diseases as a causal factor in total.  Did Covid-19 cause all of those 120,000 additional deaths or were they caused by, in the case of diabetes, strokes and heart attacks for example, the additional 50lbs that a material percentage of people put on during the lockdowns (and over 20lbs on average!) from eating takeout trash full of fast carbs and being involuntarily cooped up in their homes?  We do not know so this can only describe an upper boundary or caused mortality -- not a lower one.

This analysis doesn't mean even more people didn't die with Covid, but an alleged "Covid" death that wasn't accompanied by one of the CDC's specifically-called out diseases.  The CDC "selects" these specific categories and ICD codes, I remind you, because they're particularly large percentages of the whole among diseases that kill people.  When the CDC says that only a few thousand people died of Covid alone this data is rather interesting wouldn't you say?

After all being shot while Covid positive, or ODing, dying in a car wreck or wrapping your motorcycle around a telephone pole in no way implies you died of Covid, does it?  To so-imply or state is to deliberately deceive the public and inculcate fear; it is a lie.

Yet the media and government have in fact said it did because they have repeatedly claimed more than four times the number of people who the CDC links to specific diseases in fact died "of" Covid-19.

The CDC's own data proves they lied.

Further, they claim that we had "no evidence" for the effectiveness of repurposed drugs; that's also bald lie in that there are at least two which are specifically used en-masse by millions in the group of people in two of these morbidity buckets and both of them saw materially less death than was expected.  In other words we had very strong observational evidence across a huge body of people that these drugs are protective and did nothing with that information.  Had we acted and had those drugs proved effective the EUAs for vaccines would have been illegal, there would have been no need or desire for vaccines at all and a huge number of people who are currently dead would still be alive.

To be blunt: By the CDC's own data the FDA, NIH, CDC, Fauci and others lied and as a direct result people died.

Do you think they're being honest about the safety of the jabs given these facts?  After all it's your ass since they made sure you couldn't sue or prosecute anyone if they get caught lying again.

The CDC's published source files from which you can reproduce these results on your own are found here and here.

PS: How long before, if the "unknown" data verifies, Mr. Puddinhead is forced to go on TV and eulogize all those who died due to taking shots predicated on a bogus premise, specifically one crafted before we had the science on the fact that the spike protein itself is pathogenic, as is now known -- and thus any such attempt would inevitably harm or kill a significant number of people -- more than the non-morbid percentage who die from natural infection, since their body is able to prevent the infection from becoming systemic.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)