When expressed in “sigmas”, units of standard deviation, the 23.24% drop in the birth rate in Taiwan is a 26-sigma event!
What's particularly eyebrow-raising is that this is not confined to one place and is correlated quite-nastily with jab percentage in multiple nations, specifically also in Germany.
I will repeat a caution I've put forward before: Correlation is not proof of causation.
For instance it has been known for quite some time that people with Alzheimer's have an abundance of plaques that, the claim goes, interfere with neural transmission and are essentially the cause of the disease. Therefore pharma has spent a lot of money trying to come up with drugs that either prevent or remove said plaques. Makes sense, right? Remove or prevent the plaques, the disease goes away -- or at least does not progress.
Except.... the premise has now been proved false, not that this stopped people from making a lot of money chasing a blown theory. And our government's "regulatory agencies" have knowingly endorsed that.
You see, we recently had an Alzheimer's drug approved that reliably and statistically reduced said plaques but it did nothing to reverse or slow the cognitive decline. The drug failed to show statistical improvement against placebo on cognitive capacity and yet it was approved anyway.
So now we know that Alzheimer's is not caused by these plaques because removing them neither arrests or reverses the condition. Therefore its not the cause. Period.
But there was money to be made, you see..... so it was. Even though the drug proved worthless against the only thing that matters -- whether your cognitive capacity continues to be damaged on a progressive basis. The FDA approved it anyway, despite knowing it did not stop disease progression. They approved a proved worthless drug and pharma, of course, will make the money from it despite the fact that it does nothing to improve (say much less cure) the primary indication.
If you think this is a lone event -- nope. Statins are another example. They do reliably lower cholesterol levels and the statistical evidence there is clear and unequivocal. But what they don't do is prevent death from all causes; the data is that, with very few patient cohort exceptions (specifically, those persons who have already had a heart attack) they do not reduce your risk of death. This, incidentally, has been known for a long time and is proof that cholesterol is not the cause of fatal heart attacks and strokes. But this fact has done nothing to prevent billions of dollars being made on a drug handed out like candy on Halloween.
So be careful here, because we have correlation -- but, thus far, we don't know how "sticky" that is. If it isn't sticky then it might well not be related to the believed cause, other than tangentially. That is, it may well be that the fear porn or other related factors went into people not screwing as often or choosing to use birth control rather than not and thus while the statistic is real its not caused by the shot.
If, however, it persists over the next few quarters now that the virus and fear porn associated with it have been attenuated to a large degree then it is reasonable to believe that the damage, given when it started and the nine month lag before births occur, likely is caused by the jabs.
What's worse is that if it is persistent the damage is obviously long-lasting and might be permanent -- catastrophically so for those who took the shots. One in five, roughly, is nasty beyond anyone's worst imagination. Indeed, over the space of a decade or two it will collapse entire societies and governments by very-effectively destroying enough of the next generation that earnings, tax collections and thus government funding will all be ruined with no hope of redemption or reversal for 20+ years -- a generation.
My "1 in 30" best guess for people who are completely screwed as a result of the existing jabs looks like a lower boundary at this point and is verifying. The upper boundary of my calculations was nasty enough that it would have been irresponsible to publish it without very strong evidence of plausibility -- and I still don't have that evidence in a form that I can defend.
We'll see -- but in the meantime if you're of child-creating age you might want to think about what you're going to do to the people who did this to you via lack of testing and wildly unethical actions if, in point of fact, you're the one in five.
Oh, and if you think that's bad, two days ago the FDA decided that for any jab related to an existing one no clinical trials -- and thus no evidence of safety or effectiveness -- are required for approval. The manufacturers are knowingly distributing, with FDA approval, vaccines against extinct strains of a disease and no longer must show any evidence of either safety or effectiveness before it goes into people.
If you ever take one of these again, or allow your children to be given one, you're a five-alarm idiot and deserve exactly what happens to you.
Dr. Mengele had nothing on these assholes.