The Market Ticker
Commentary on The Capital Markets

So let me guess -- now a teen girl who chooses not to wear the Muslim-mandated Hijab at school is fair game to be assaulted? Whether this is your kid or not doesn't matter; assault is assault, and this is America, not Saudi Arabia.

The girl, who was reported as being Omar’s relative, was attending Hickman High School in Columbia on November 24 when the Libyan-born Omar arrived at about 3 PM and allegedly confronted the girl for not wearing the traditional Muslim head covering in public.

According to the Columbia Daily Tribune, Omar grabbed the girl “very violently by the hair,” then pulled her outside of the class and down a flight of stairs.

He was arrested (good) and charged with felony abuse (good).

Now tell me why he's an assistant professor and exactly how and why he's here in the United States, when his Facebook page shows that he is originally from Libya.

Should not one of the requirements to be present in the United States and be able to work here be your willingness to abide our secular system of laws -- which do not permit you to demand "muslim modesty standards" for women (among other things.)

If you do not respect our form of government and its secular configuration get the hell out.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

2015-11-30 07:34 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 174 references

And yet again UofC shows why you should shred any resume you get from any of their grads.

The University of Chicago announced Sunday that all classes and other activities planned for Monday on its Hyde Park campus will be canceled after FBI counterterrorism officials informed the university of a gun violence threat to the campus.

University President Robert Zimmer sent an email to students and staff warning them of a threat posted online by an unknown individual, which specifically mentioned "the campus quad" at 10 a.m. Monday.

President Zimmer is a coward.

Assuming the threat is credible (and the FBI apparently thinks it is) there are a very small number of people who threatened to do something evil with a gun.

There are thousands of people that attend, either as students or employees, at UofC.

Tell them to bring their guns.

Want to try to playing Allah Akhbar or similar?  Go ahead when everyone around you is carrying.  It'll last 2 seconds and you'll get exactly one round off -- maybe -- before you're dropped where you stand.

See, nobody has eyes in the back of their head.  This means that while you can try something like this in an armed society you won't get anywhere doing it and your horrific plan will simply turn into a suicide, which suits me just fine.

Instead today our "first response" is for thousands to cower in fear?

May I remind you that on June 6th, 1944 thousands of Americans, most of them young boys, faced German machine guns and artillery pieces while storming a beach and dropping out of the sky?  They went, many of them died within seconds and all knew exactly what they were facing before going.  They went anyway and they prevailed.  If they hadn't gone you'd be speaking German right now.

No, I do not want anyone who has the UofC's response to such a threat working for me and you shouldn't either.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

This is one of the dumbest articles I've seen to date:

The National Security Agency’s sweeping authority to collect phone-record data expired Sunday, despite evidence that such programs helped European officials track down the perpetrators of the recent Paris suicide bombing attacks and prevented other attacks.

North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told “Fox News Sunday” that investigators in France and Belgium found a cellphone number, then were able to see other numbers to which it had contacted, thwarting another attack and leading to at least a dozen arrests.


And you want to know what the reality of that was?  The seized the cellular device and the terrorists were using ordinary, unencrypted text messages.

In other words they weren't very smart, and further, ordinary police work, complete with warrants, was enough to catch them before they hit Paris -- if the good guys were on the ball, which they clearly were not.

After all they let at least one and perhaps a couple more of these clownfaces into the EU in the so-called "refugees" without first verifying if they were refugees or terrorists!

The same was true before 9/11.  There was more than enough information available, all developed lawfully and without intruding on our civil rights, to stop the attack.  There was a report from the Florida flight school to the FBI, there was at least one of the hijackers who tried to get into the country, failed, and then came in through a different border and wasn't stopped the second time and even more-incredibly one of the hijackers (Muossaoui) was actually arrested in August yet they never searched his apartment!  He too had aroused suspicion by taking flight training, in his case in Minnesota.

Note well that this guy was busted formally for immigration violations.  We had every right to remove him from the country right then and there.  We didn't, just like Jeb Bush's Administration in Florida granted Driver Licenses to the majority of the terrorists despite them not being either permanent residents or citizens.

These are often called "missed opportunities" by those who are being kind to the government.

I call it criminal gross negligence, because it is.

The government can come talk to me about needing to rewrite the 4th Amendment when and only when they actually use the tools they already have, and those prove insufficient.  Thus far there has been exactly zero evidence in support of that with 9/11 or any of the other evil acts that have taken place in similar character, including those that just occurred in Paris.

A bungling government is at least as bad as a malignant one and perhaps worse, since once they have data like this it never goes away and if they can't manage to handle and use it properly what makes you think they can keep it from being stolen by people who would use it for evil intent?

Now there's something to think about -- oh wait, someone already has stolen a lot of data of similar character, haven't they?

OPM anyone?

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

It is often said that one cannot "paint the whole" of the police forces with the brush of a few bad cops -- like, perhaps, the one who allegedly murdered a teen in Chicago.

That may be true, right up until one of two things happens:

1. Others willfully and intentionally cover up, tamper with evidence, or otherwise obstruct an investigation.  Then it is entirely fair to lump them in with the person who committed the offense and even charge them with felonies.  Indeed, it is expected that you would do so.

2. Others, including voluntary associations and trade unions, back the accused in what he or she did.  In that event every member of the association or union that does not immediately resign is properly painted with the same brush.


On its website, the Chicago lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), has posted a bail fund appeal for the officer, Jason Van Dyke, who is accused of shooting 17-year-old Laquan McDonald 16 times just six seconds after emerging from his patrol car on a street in Chicago on Oct. 20, 2014. An earlier link on the FOP's front page to a GoFundMe campaign was removed after the fundraising site said it violated a policy against its use by criminal defendants.

The FOP also is paying the lawyer representing Van Dyke, Daniel Herbert, himself a former FOP member the union pays to represent Chicago cops in misconduct cases. Funding such a defense is a common practice among U.S. police unions. 

'Nuff said.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

Obama has once again tried to turn a nutjob shooting people at a Planned Parenthood clinic into a call for "more gun control", as if somehow passing more laws against murder will make murder less prevalent.

May I remind you that you may only prosecute someone for the first murder, no matter how many they commit or how many other crimes they commit before, during or after, because you can only serve one life sentence or give someone the death penalty once.

It is therefore idiotic to pretend that passing more laws on guns (the 50,000+ already on the books aren't enough?) will stop murders.  A person willing to commit murder has already decided that the law is no object to their evil intentions, irrespective of whether you like it or not.

But then there's this case -- a 9 year old boy shot by a gang because the gang didn't like his Dad.

Where's Obama on that calling for these criminal gangs to be dismantled and every single one of the people involved being tossed in the hoosegow for life?

And why isn't that shooting his poster child for gun control?

You know the answer, right?

It has a lot to do with the race of the shooter in the two incidents..... and the utterly common incidence of the second sort of thing in Chicago -- where a nutjob shooting up a Planned Parenthood clinic is -- fortunately -- very rare.

Obama's sons are always ignored when they do things like this, aren't they?

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

Main Navigation
MUST-READ Selection:
Really, Let's Cut the Crap Eh?

Full-Text Search & Archives
Archive Access

Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media or for commercial use.

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.