We have unprecedented levels of low unemployment in America. It could even be said that we really have too many jobs and not enough people to fill them. While this currently isn’t a problem, it will soon have devastating impacts on our nation’s economic stability, and the only answer is to increase immigration to America.
In the past 60 years, the birthrate in the United States has decreased by over 50 percent and is only falling faster. This is not by design.
There are multiple factors contributing to this trend: people are getting married later and having kids later in life, women are focusing on their careers more than ever before, and contraception has become more effective.
All of these causes make one thing clear: the declining birthrate shows no sign of stopping.
Well gee, so you think this is just about women marrying later and having kids later in life?
Are women focusing on their careers or being forced to in order to eat?
Yes, contraception has become more effective -- that's good rather than bad. I presume you don't think a high abortion rate is good, yes? Oh wait -- we have that too. How effective is that contraception you flaunt so daringly?
Why don't you take a big mug of STFU, quaff it and sit down, jackass.
America (and the rest of the western world) has spent the last fifty plus years doing all of the following:
- Punishing men for choosing to have children. That's right -- punishing. If you're a man there is literally no possible way for you to secure the right to raise your own kids. Even if you have billions you can't get there from here. You have better odds if you have money and your wife (or paramour) decides to cut you out of the picture but most of the time you get both severely restricted in your ability to raise said kids and you get the whole bill. You don't think that situation, which the "feminists" cooked up and rammed down everyone's throats might make men who are intelligent, skilled and desirous of a family think twice about making children, do you?
- Punishing women for choosing to have children. That's right -- punishing. If you're a woman how often do you hear the bull**** about you can have it all, chick! -- career, motherhood, etc? How many kids are in daycare instead of home and why does daycare exist if this is true? Oh by the way, how do you pay for said daycare and how many hours out of the waking day do you spend raising said kids? Well under half. What the hell sort of message does that send -- that you're a walking uterus and once you crank out that baby it'll take a village! Oh Hitlery, cry me a ****ing river you evil five-alarm bitch. Not one woman in a thousand can pull the **** you and your spawn got away with. If you think this is some grand voluntary set of choices for 99.99% of women in America go visit all those women who don't have much in the way of choice at all; that would be damned near all of them. It's not like the "zero inflation, high productivity" world we live in and have for the last 50 years, according to the government, has made it trivial for a single-earner, two parent household to buy a house, put food in the fridge, keep the water and power on and pay for the trip to the doctor when the juniors get the sniffles has it? Why do you think we have all those abortions taking place *******?
You think people don't respond to incentives? The hell they don't.
You think a woman chooses to have an abortion when she can reasonably choose to have and raise the child instead? What sort of bullcrap is that? You think the 16, 18, 20 or 25 year old woman created the societal circumstances we live in today -- the near-requirement for two good incomes among a couple to raise a kid in most metropolitan areas of the nation, $100,000 college tuition bills, $10,000+ property tax bills, $20,000 per year family "health insurance" policy costs and more? Schools that are diverse but where half the ****ing High School "graduates" can't write a basic business letter, balance a checkbook or make change for a $20 in their head?
Did said young woman -- or young man -- get a vote on that property tax bill? Did they get to choose whether their teacher was minimally competent in basic mathematics? Did they have a voice -- any voice whatsoever -- in the crap that was stuffed in their heads for the previous 20 years?
Who created, promoted and continues that pattern today? The power structure in our government does and nearly all of it is felony-level fraud from top to bottom.
The article points out that Medicare and Medicaid currently spend $1.3 trillion a year. Uh, gee, someone else has read the MTS -- the government's official general ledger! Fancy that.
What that article doesn't point out is that the tax rate on Medicare covers less than a third of the Medicare spending and zero of Medicaid!
Oh by the way -- that omission isn't an accident.
Social Security isn't the problem -- it's running a small (about 15%) cash deficit and can be reasonably fixed by either raising the cap on FICA tax, modestly increasing the tax rate or some combination of the two, along with getting all the able-bodied fraudsters (there are a lot of them) off SSDI. Likely half of those on SSDI can work -- they just choose not to because they're not highly-skilled and all-in they figure it's better to sit around on their ass and blow the government check on booze, drugs or both.
Medicare and Medicaid, when those programs were put in place, lived in a world when health care was 3-4% of GDP -- that is, 3-4% of the economy. Despite the greatest improvement in technology the world has ever seen over the last 50 or so years, which is the definition of productivity and which should have dropped that percentage of the economy by half or thereabouts instead medical care has increased as a percentage of GDP by more than five hundred percent and every damn bit of it is directly a result of the government -- and it wasn't an accident, it was done intentionally.
If we lived in a nation where the Rule of Law meant anything every single member of said government and all of those involved in same would have long been indicted, tried, convicted and hung. There would be a literal gallows on the National Mall.
This is all fraud and felony and it has utterly destroyed, along with the bull**** run by Marxists, some of whom claim to be "feminists", the incentives for people to have children. As a direct result intelligent men and women are choosing not to.
Rather than solve those problems and re-create said incentives this jackass in the referenced article and many just like her of both sexes instead propose to import tens of millions of stupid, uneducated and illiterate people.
Why do they have to be stupid, uneducated and illiterate?
Because if you import educated and intelligent people they won't make any children either -- they can and will figure out that their kids, should they choose to have them, are overwhelmingly at odds of getting screwed and thus you've gained nothing.
So instead all the various thugs and felons who infest both think tanks and government propose to and actively do import a bunch of people who can't add 2 + 2 or, much worse, who intend to use a penis and vagina as a means of forcibly overthrowing our representative government over time, installing a religious caliphate in its place.
Medicaid, I remind you, in states that have "capitated" same spends about $700/month per person. If you import a stupid and uneducated person and allow them to have legal status they will place over $8,400 a year on the government in the form of spending instantly and forever just on this one program alone. If said person can make $10 or even $15/hour they'll never pay anywhere near that $8,400 in taxes annually and that ignores the rest of the tax expenditures (e.g. school costs for the kids they bring in with them or make once here, SNAP, WIC, Section 8 housing, EITC and more.)
You cannot get out of this box via immigration and attempting it will simply speed up the collapse.
The short term answer is to break all the medical monopolies and start throwing people in prison for violating the law. This, by the way, isn't a choice because those stupid, uneducated and illiterate people are incapable of earning enough income to pay a material amount of tax in excess of that which they consume in government services. It's true that said people pay taxes (e.g. if you rent a place to live you pay property taxes in your rent just as certainly as you do if you buy a house) but in terms of their total tax contribution .vs. government outlays it is either neutral or negative, and in terms of Medicare and Medicaid it is deeply negative.
Breaking the medical monopolies will halt the collapse immediately and it is the only means of doing so. This is not politics -- it's math and there is no escaping mathematics.
2024 is not far away folks and the nasty is that close. Those aren't my numbers they're the government's numbers.
Longer term the solution is found in fixing the incentive structure in this nation so that:
- Both sexes (yes, there are only two) who desire families can pair off and be reasonably certain they will be able to raise their children even if something goes wrong in their adult relationship. This means a complete upending of how divorce, custody and child support work in the United States. There are answers to this problem that do not require a return to the 1950s paradigm; there were serious injustices then but what we have now is worse as intelligent members of both sexes are literally choosing to commit slow genocide by choice rather than create children that they know will have no reasonable hope of a decent future. We either fix this on a legal level or we will never have educated, intelligent couples choosing to have more than a replacement level of children. Period.
- The lie of "low inflation" and "great standards of living" has to be turned into a truth. This means the destruction of monopolist and cost-of-living jacking practices across the board so that virtually any couple can have one person go earn a living and the second raise kids at home. It has to work everywhere in the United States, not just if you're able to earn $200,000+ a year in a city or $100 large in the suburbs and rural areas. Chief among the cost-push problems are those imposed by the medical scam but the issue does not solely lie there. Teacher, police, fire and other public-sector unions must be destroyed outright; they are largely responsible for the insane cost-of-living ramp via embedded and hidden taxes and fees that drive up everyone's cost of living. Even FDR, a staunch socialist, said that public-employee unions were unacceptable and needed to be banned. The reason for this is clear: An adversarial negotiation, which wage and working conditions always is, cannot take place if one side of the table can vote the other side out of office and replace them! Every one of these unions is by definition an instrument of financial******and fraud and anyone maintaining or attempting to maintain them needs to go to prison -- or be tried and hung.
No, those changes aren't going to come in a day. But then again neither will fixing demographics. It requires at minimum 20 years to start to fix a demographic shift since that's how long it takes to choose to have a kid, make the kid and raise the kid!
Demographics is destiny and the fact of the matter is that unless we provide incentives for intelligent and educated people in this country to produce at least a replacement rate of children there is no long-term solution; said educated and intelligent people will disappear as a result of their own choices. Unless you intend to imitate Genghis Khan and start raping women as he did you have only incentives to work with; there is no forcible way forward that government can elect.
Importing people who are unintelligent and uneducated only makes the problem worse and also invites into our nation those who would, under that guise, use their reproductive capabilities to destroy the very foundation of this nation by breeding a huge number of people who have no respect for representative government, no intention of assimilating and every intention of, when their numbers are numerous enough, overthrowing said government and our Representative Republic by force.