@Homelessnomad - Natural infection confers a balance of response to a similar threat in the future. The vaccines, however, do not mimic that balance; they instead focus all attention in one place.

While that "one place" appears to work at first blush what we now know is that the protection is not durable. Plenty of people said "oh, don't worry, you get T-cell "S" protein recognition from the vaccines too and that will protect you."

As it turns out it doesn't and the actual protection wanes quite rapidly. There is now data that it drops to under 50% within six months. This is bad because failures risk promoting mutational escape and yet repeated jabs run the risk of exponentially-increasing risk of adverse events that screw you immediately and permanently (e.g. heart attacks, strokes, etc.) We know neither the shape of that adverse-event risk curve with repeated jabs nor do we have well-characterized understanding of the damage done to pre-existing natural immunity.

If you were previously infected you get very broad and long-lasting protection. The jabs appear to damage that, but the exact scope of that damage is not well-characterized at this point. We didn't take the time to find out before jabbing people, in short, and so now we get to find out the hard way.

----------