The preliminary numbers are there BUT you're still getting them from two different places, and in addition you have to trend-fit the previous 10 years (which I had already done.)

Attempting to disentangle the alleged Covid-19 deaths will be impossible as they deliberately polluted the data, but what is clear is that those who the virus did kill (and there were plenty of them, although not as many as claimed) were killed because of the government's policies and the health care system going along with it in order to collect the money, and not a virus.

This is exactly what happened in 1918 EXCEPT in 1918 the government didn't do it, the secondary bacterial infections did and antibiotics hadn't been discovered yet so despite a DESIRE to help there were no tools usable for the task.

This time there were myriad tools which we knew worked including HCQ, Ivermectin and Budesonide, along with many other helpful things like resolving Vitamin D deficiency -- the latter which we knew was a major factor for viral infections ten years ago in older people yet did nothing about it.

The former three were all known by April of 2020; all three were known safe. Ivermectin proved by summer to be wildly superior to HCQ, but even so HCQ works if used early -- which the doctors deliberately did not do.

Both 1918's flu and this virus do not and did not kill, with very few exceptions. In both cases it was the secondary events that killed; in 1918 bacterial infection and this time immune dysregulation.

In 1918 we didn't know how to stop it because we didn't have the tools.

THIS TIME we did know how to stop it early for each infection, we did have the tools, they were cheap and available yet we intentionally refused to use them.

That's mass-homicide.
Period.

----------