Prior infection, *******s provide best protection from *****
In that order.
And it wasn't close either.
By early October, compared with unvaccinated people who didn’t have a prior infection, case rates were:
— 6-fold lower in California and 4.5-fold lower in New York in those who were vaccinated but not previously infected.
— 29-fold lower in California and 15-fold lower in New York in those who had been infected but never vaccinated.
— 32.5-fold lower in California and 20-fold lower in New York in those who had been infected and vaccinated.
So being infected and recovered was anywhere from three to nearly five times as protective as being "vaccinated."
There was no statistically-significant improvement if "vaccinated" after infection.
I put "vaccinated" in quotes because from this data it is clear that these are not *******s at all; they do not induce immunity, sterilizing or otherwise, at anything approaching that which occurs if you get infected. By any rational set of analytical standards they are defective products and grossly unfit for purpose.
What's even worse for the jabs is that when Delta hit there were no jabs more than six months old, approximately, yet there were many infections that occurred more than a year prior. Therefore being infected was not only three to five times as protective it was protective over a much longer period as well!
So if you were infected and then talked into or even coerced or forced into taking the jabs you were conned. You got statistically nothing out of that jab of value but you took risk -- maybe very serious risk and permanent harm.
This isn't my claim or data this is the CDC's data.
Time for lawsuits against every entity that deprived someone of a liberty or privilege, or who successfully coerced you and then you suffered a side effect from the jab. Not only has there never been a viral disease, ever, for which being jabbed was defensible on the premise of immunity after being infected in the past this one is no different. As for all of those who coerced, urged and now, since it is now proved they lied as they had no scientific basis whatsoever for their claims it is my sincere hope that every one of them are brought to justice in this life and I am certain they will be in the next.
Again this is not my data, these are not my claims, these are official study results from the CDC itself who has now documented that in fact prior infection is anywhere from three to nearly five times as protective as vaccination.
The comparison isn't even close and I hope the landsharks chew off all of the responsible parties asses. They all have it coming and deserve every bit of evil served upon them.
You think the UK's actions were taken not knowing this was about to land? Like hell it wasn't.
Having had *****-19 and recovered from it I will never take your damned shots and no, I won't sit for or tolerate any bull**** restrictions either. You're lying now, you were always lying, the CDC now admits THEY and YOU were both lying the entire time and I will be more than happy to **** UP YOUR LIFE and take every single ****ing thing you have, reduce you to penury and worse if you try any of that crap on me.
**** AROUND AND FIND OUT YOU LYING SACKS OF ****.
And no, I will NEVER forgive OR forget what every single person and organization that pushed this bull**** has done, nor excuse the harm they have inflicted across the board, particularly those who at the same time they pushed this crap denied therapeutics which, if and when they succeed as they did in my individual case, lead to said more-durable and superior immunity.