The Market Ticker - Cancelled
What 'They' Don't Want Published- Category [Covid-19]
Logging in or registering will improve your experience here
Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. For investment, legal or other professional advice specific to your situation contact a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be sent unmodified to lawmakers via print or electronic means or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media, to republish full articles, or for any commercial use (which includes any site where advertising is displayed.)

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.

Considering sending spam? Read this first.

2022-01-19 21:59 by Karl Denninger
in *****-19 , 378 references
[Comments enabled]  

During the Delta wave of *****....

Prior infection, *******s provide best protection from *****

In that order.

And it wasn't close either.

By early October, compared with unvaccinated people who didn’t have a prior infection, case rates were:

— 6-fold lower in California and 4.5-fold lower in New York in those who were vaccinated but not previously infected.

29-fold lower in California and 15-fold lower in New York in those who had been infected but never vaccinated.

— 32.5-fold lower in California and 20-fold lower in New York in those who had been infected and vaccinated.

So being infected and recovered was anywhere from three to nearly five times as protective as being "vaccinated."

There was no statistically-significant improvement if "vaccinated" after infection.

I put "vaccinated" in quotes because from this data it is clear that these are not *******s at all; they do not induce immunity, sterilizing or otherwise, at anything approaching that which occurs if you get infected.  By any rational set of analytical standards they are defective products and grossly unfit for purpose.

What's even worse for the jabs is that when Delta hit there were no jabs more than six months old, approximately, yet there were many infections that occurred more than a year prior.  Therefore being infected was not only three to five times as protective it was protective over a much longer period as well!

So if you were infected and then talked into or even coerced or forced into taking the jabs you were conned.  You got statistically nothing out of that jab of value but you took risk -- maybe very serious risk and permanent harm.

This isn't my claim or data this is the CDC's data.

Time for lawsuits against every entity that deprived someone of a liberty or privilege, or who successfully coerced you and then you suffered a side effect from the jab.  Not only has there never been a viral disease, ever, for which being jabbed was defensible on the premise of immunity after being infected in the past this one is no different.  As for all of those who coerced, urged and now, since it is now proved they lied as they had no scientific basis whatsoever for their claims it is my sincere hope that every one of them are brought to justice in this life and I am certain they will be in the next.

Again this is not my data, these are not my claims, these are official study results from the CDC itself who has now documented that in fact prior infection is anywhere from three to nearly five times as protective as vaccination. 

The comparison isn't even close and I hope the landsharks chew off all of the responsible parties asses.  They all have it coming and deserve every bit of evil served upon them.

You think the UK's actions were taken not knowing this was about to land?  Like hell it wasn't.

Having had *****-19 and recovered from it I will never take your damned shots and no, I won't sit for or tolerate any bull**** restrictions either.  You're lying now, you were always lying, the CDC now admits THEY and YOU were both lying the entire time and I will be more than happy to **** UP YOUR LIFE and take every single ****ing thing you have, reduce you to penury and worse if you try any of that crap on me.


And no, I will NEVER forgive OR forget what every single person and organization that pushed this bull**** has done, nor excuse the harm they have inflicted across the board, particularly those who at the same time they pushed this crap denied therapeutics which, if and when they succeed as they did in my individual case, lead to said more-durable and superior immunity.



View this entry with comments (opens new window)

2021-12-21 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in *****-19 , 2020 references
[Comments enabled]  

To Joe, to all the Reeeing Karens, to Jerome Powell, to Anthony Fraudci and hundreds more:


If you don't read sign language I'll do it in English: **** YOU.

Oh, yes, the stawk market looooves it some bull**** out of the ******* makers.  Moderna's shares were on a tear yesterday -- until people said "wait a second, what?"  Why?  Because muh variant, that's why.  Who forgot that everyone, including Moderna, Pfizer, Biden, Fauci and everyone else just a few months ago told us all: If you take these shots you won't get *****.  We're sure of it.

It was a lie.

It wasn't an error, it was a lie.

I pointed out originally when the trials were going on that they were both underpowered and deliberately did not seek to demonstrate that the jabs actually prevented getting ***** or transmitting it to others.  Proving that is indeed possible but it takes more people, far better surveillance with routine tests on a once or twice a week basis across the entire jabbed population and thus you build statistical evidence.  For an EUA we did not require it, the FDA did not demand it, neither did Trump or HHS and thus we didn't get it.

In short there was no reason at all to believe that they worked in that fashion -- that is, that any sort of public-health argument for them would ever have merit.  At best the EUA process undertaken was one that could potentially demonstrate that for a short time, a few months, one obtained a personal benefit.

Note: Personal benefit.

This made the entire edifice of using these jabs as a means of "ending the pandemic" an outright fraud.  I so-noted at the time, roughly one year ago.

Nobody cared and I was called all manner of crazy.

Well, I was right.  Not because I wanted to be right, but because I was; there simply was no evidence demanded or developed that durable and stable immunity, never mind interrupting transmission, was possible with this path.  It had never worked before and we did not demand it of the manufacturers for authorization.

Now maybe that's good enough on a voluntary basis.  Or is it?

Well, only if you clearly and fairly disclose the risks.

Which, as with Vioxx, was in the original data.  Of course you had to look, and you had to care.  You also had to run to the ground that which was developed early; in September 2020, to be exact, there was scientific evidence that the spike protein, absent the rest of the virus, was individually dangerous.  This discovery did set off further inquiry and it was subsequently confirmed.

We did none of that further investigation on a formal basis nor did we care or act on that which was developed.

We didn't do it with Vioxx either, did we?  Nope -- that took 60,000 dead Americans and five years before we cut the bull****, and that was for a drug that helped with pain from arthritis!  This is a global cash cow and if it makes people sick and thus forces them to take even more drugs and spend more money in the hospital that's good for all the ghouls bank accounts.  That you get ****ed in the process is a call the Whaaambulance event and all of this has occurred because you let it happen.

Pfizer has disclosed in their own data that for young people the shots are as dangerous, as measured in hospitalization, for ***** as they are for caused myocarditis.  Since infection is never certain but inoculation, once you take it, is there was never an argument for authorizing these jabs in healthy young people simply on the math.  We did it anyway and we're still advocating it.


That is just one condition but let's be clear: If you jab your kid you're putting them at equal or greater risk of being hospitalized from one side effect of the ******* alone as from *****-19 itself.  If you do that as a parent you're a monster.  If you do it as a young adult on your own absent some individualized risk you're stupid.

Anyone who believes that an agent injected into the muscle of the arm that can and does sometimes cause inflammation of the heart will not also cause inflammation of other tissues and, through doing so, also cause damage to other tissues has rocks in their head.  The scope of that additional damage is completely unknown because we're not performing any surveillance nor did we originally.  We have never, for example, taken a group of 100 people, pulled full blood work including markers for inflammation, cardiac damage and others, then vaccinated them and repeated said tests on a 2, 4, 8 and 16 week interval to determine if we got negative metabolic changes and if we did, whether they were transient or durable.  Nobody knows because we never did the work.

But it is entirely reasonable to expect that additional risk of stroke, heart attack, pulmonary embolism and more, all of which are life-altering, produce permanent disability and can be fatal, would be made materially more-likely by an agent that causes myocarditis.  Indeed that would be a reasonable medical presumption; inflammation in the body is a known contributing factor to strokes and VTE which encompasses pulmonary embolisms.

Given the billions that these companies have made you'd think we would have required such in-detail tracing, collection of information and publication of the results.  We did not then and still haven't.

Omicron has now thrown mud in everyone's eye by doing exactly what every coronavirus has done through time -- mutationally evaded the neutralization potential of vaccination.  Every single attempt at vaccination against a coronavirus in the past in both man and beast has failed to produce durable immunity.  Several attempts have resulted in wildly-enhanced disease.  We're seeing the latter now with attack rates in vaccinated people exceeding that for unvaccinated with Omicron.


The only good news is that it may be true that Omicron is less-virulent; there is some early evidence that it is much less replication-competent in the lungs.  That's a good thing because upper respiratory infection is not serious; it is the lung infection that gets you.  In other words it may be that Omicron is a nasty cold.  That it is more-able to infect vaccinated people than not is troubling but if its less-virulent it may not matter -- indeed it may be a blessing.  We don't yet know and won't for a few months, and that assumes we get honest data -- which we may not.

What also remains to be seen is if being vaccinated continues to show evidence of not building "N" protein recognition if you get Omicron after being jabbed.  That would be extraordinarily unfortunate if it is true.  It's once again too early to know if that pattern holds and we likely won't have a clean read on it for a few months either.

Never mind the "outbreak" of TB at Goldman which is quite-concerning given how TB actually works; since Goldman has required all people in-office to be vaccinated and TB is a low-speed disaster to get a cluster like that leads one to ask whether the suspicions of immune system suppression by the jabs are in fact showing up.  TB is a very slow-progressing infection and tends to be latent for months or even years without becoming known or clinically significant.  That a "cluster" of cases apparently went active "all at once" implies that something took what were non-dangerous latent infections and turned them active, dangerous and contagious.  What was the "something" we did that was unique to potentially cause this over the last, oh, half-year or so?

You know damn well what we did.

Anecdotes are not data even in volume but if that doesn't send your eyebrows up you're not paying attention and if that immune damage is in fact a widespread or even worse, nearly-universal "side effect" of these jabs then 200 million Americans have bought themselves durable or even permanent increased susceptibility to all manner of nasty outcomes.  The next decade or so could well be a banner for the "health care" business -- and disastrous for 2/3rds or more of the United States.  You only thought Obamacare was bad in driving up your health care costs -- how'd you like to add onto Obamacare's wild acceleration in cost being continually sick with ever-worsening infections and problems that your immune system should be entirely-capable of handling -- but it can't anymore because the jabs severely and durably damaged it?

Yes, that is not yet something that can be pinned on the jabs with scientific certainty but the anecdotes are piling up, and if it turns out to be true there won't be a thing you can do about it.  In that case buying a gun will be both much cheaper and hurt a lot less than what you have headed your way as there's not a damn thing you can do about it now if you took the jabs.

Might all this be worth it if the jabs were sterilizing?  Maybe.  But for a jab that is not sterilizing; that is, does not stop you from getting *****-19 and giving it to others it is a much more-complicated situation because now there is no benefit to anyone other than you, and the risk of a life-altering or even life-ending event is very real.  Your personal situation may make the balance of risks favorable for you but under utterly no circumstance does anyone else, no matter who they are, have the right to try to coerce you into choosing one way or the other.  Indeed such a "mandate" is reasonably viewed as a felony assault with intent to commit great bodily harm (including possible death) and thus justifies the use of whatever force is necessary to terminate that coercive act.

Don't expect the clown-car brigade to ever admit they were wrong about this.  To do so would be to invite 200 million Americans to hold a BBQ with politicians and so-called "business leaders" as the guests of honor.  If you think that will ever be so much as whispered by those in power you're nuts; they are crazy, but not that stupid.

Nonetheless the facts are what they are.

It's just business, you see -- when you run out of willing customers, especially when you have something that doesn't work, your only way to keep selling things is to shove a gun in people's faces.

The problem with doing it is that said people can and will find ways to at least get something back -- even if they don't get even.  If you think productivity was bad last quarter -- you ain't seen nothing yet.


View this entry with comments (opens new window)

2021-09-24 05:03 by Karl Denninger
in *****-19 , 12693 references
[Comments enabled]  

... in a not-so-tiny nation called Spain, a nursing home had a nasty virus get into it.

It was March of 2020.  The nasty virus was called *****-19.  And this nursing home, like so many others all over the world, was full of elderly, morbid people.  The mean age of residents was 85 and 48% were over 80 years old.  It was a killing field, like so many others.....

Within three months 100% of the residents had caught the virus.  Not presumed to have -- proved to have.

How do we know this?  Because almost every one of them seroconverted.  All but three out of 84 of them, to be precise.

Think about that last sentence for a second.

Almost every one of them seroconverted.

How's that possible?  Many of them died, right?  You can't seroconvert if you're dead.

No.  Not only did nearly none die none went to the hospital either because they rapidly figured out how to stop the virus from killing people -- and did exactly that.

You would have thought this would have been all over the news.  In point of fact not one mention of it was made.  Further, not one write-up was made in medical journals either until January of 2021, which I missed.  My bad -- out of the several hundred medical journal pieces, I missed this one.  It was brought to my attention on my forum and my jaw immediately hit the floor.

The jab train must continue, you see.  So must the ventilator train.  So must the money train, the mask train and the rest of the BS we have endured for the last 18+ months.

So must the slaughter for money, the fear, and the lies.

So what did these few nursing homes do that nobody has done since and nobody reported out at the time?

1. Early start of treatment, regardless of the severity of patient symptoms.
  - Antihistamines every 12 h: dexchlorpheniramine 2 mg, cetirizine 10 mg or loratadine 10 mg.

2. Patients with mild or recent-onset symptoms (cough, fever, general malaise, anosmia, polymyalgia):   
   - Azithromycin 500 mg orally every 24 h for 3 days if there is rapid improvement, and for 6 days if the duration of symptoms is prolonged.
   - If pain or fever, acetaminophen 650 mg/6–8 h.
   - Nasal washing and gargling with sodium bicarbonate water (half a glass of warm water with half a teaspoon of sodium bicarbonate).

3. If symptoms of severity (dyspnea, breathing difficulty, mild or moderate chest pain, with SpO2 <80%, heart rate >100 beats per minute at any time of the process):
   - Antihistamines + Azithromycin (see mild treatment management)
   - Levofloxacin 500 mg/12 h, up to 14 days of antibiotic treatment from diagnosis.
   - Mepifilin solution, 50 mg/8 h as a bronchodilator, until subjective improvement. Patients with previous lung disease (asthma or COPD) used their usual bronchodilators.
   - If the patient experienced increased breathing difficulty, prednisone 1 mg/kg/day divided into two doses until clinical improvement, and then it was slowly tapered down.
4. Prophylactic treatment for close contacts, including all asymptomatic residents:
  - Antihistamines at the same dose as symptomatic patients.

Ed 9/25 11:30 - Reformatted the cut section; it got mangled by the forum.  Still not what I'd like in terms of formatting, but at least it's readable now... and one typo corrected.

Look at that top line.

Cetrizine is otherwise known as Zyrtec.  Loratadine is otherwise known as Claritin.  Dexchlorpheniramine is not often-used in the US anymore, but it used to be.  The other two core drugs were Azithromycin and Levofloxacin, both common antibiotics with the first being the infamous "Zpak" from the HCQ+Zinc+Zpak combination that a fraudulent study was used to discredit.

Both of the first two antihistamines are available over the counter in most nations including the United States.  The dosing they used is twice that on the label.  The two antibiotics are both available anywhere for little money.

Before they started treating people three residents died.  The entire group of them had the common maladies of old age -- hypertension, diabetes, COPD, cardiovascular disease.  Most were using a huge range of existing drugs for their conditions (5 or more.)  

As soon as they started treating people the following happened:

All of our patients evolved satisfactorily and were recovered at the beginning of June. No adverse effects were recorded in any patient and no one required hospital admission. At the end of June, 100% of the residents and almost half of the workers had positive serology for *****-19, most of them with past infection.

Not one adverse event occurred among these residents and staff and no hospitalizations were necessary either.

In pooled data 28% of the residents in similar nursing homes over the same time period died.  In these two, once they started treating with cheap drugs, leading with those available over the counter in the US, ZERO -- I repeat -- ZERO had a bad reaction to the protocol, ZERO died and ZERO were admitted to a hospital for treatment.


It was one hundred percent effective.

Yes, it's a small sample.  Go do the statistical math on the CI for that size sample and results if you insist.

According to the mechanisms of action described, these drugs would act synergistically in the early stages of the disease, which is why we consider it essential to start the treatment as soon as possible. Once the virus has colonized the respiratory system, the effectiveness is probably more limited, and hence the failure of these treatments in more advanced stages of the disease, when hospital admission is necessary. In our experience, early double antibiotics were effective to control the process in cases with moderate symptoms.

Nobody cared.

Nobody reported on this.

Nobody duplicated it either.

I didn't even realize this study existed; had I known of it guess what I would have added to my protocol when I got *****-19 the first week of August of this year, since it happens to be in my medicine cabinet already for seasonal allergies?  Uh huh.  Two 60ct bottles of generic Claritin equivalent costs about $12 at WalMart.

Folks, think about this long and hard: In the worst-case scenario for those who this virus should have killed -- it killed nobody.  It should be killing statistically nobody today -- right here, right now.  How to prevent it from doing so was discovered in March and April of 2020 and intentionally ignored worldwide.

It is still being ignored today.

With these numbers there is no reason to fear a *****-19 infection.  There is no reason to take a *******.  There was never a reason to develop a *******, especially the ones we have today; infection that does not produce severe disease is sterilizing and thus wildly superior to vaccinated immunity which is now proved to be failing worldwide.  There is no reason to wear a mask.

Every single one of these residents seroconverted and became immune with mild or moderate symptoms consistent with seasonal colds and flus and not one of them was put into the hospital or killed. The treatment is so ******ned cheap and available there's no excuse to not use it instantly on suspicion of infection and prophylactically among everyone else in your household at first sign of trouble.

You think the entire load of BS around HCQ and Ivermectin is bad?  This is a thousand times worse.

Those who died did not do so due to a "novel coronavirus"; we knew how to treat that infection successfully for pennies in March and April of 2020.  Yes, in the first month or two people died because we did not know.

Beyond April of 2020 people died because we let the medical system and governments murder them for profit and they're still doing it today.  We, the people, have allowed this.  We have failed and refused to rise up and hold accountable, personally, every single hospital, doctor, so-called "hero" nurse and every single politician across the globe.  They willfully and intentionally slaughtered millions on a global basis.

The answer to the problem -- to *****-19 -- was known in March and April of 2020 and yet not published until January of this year, and even then not one single bit of media attention nor a single mention from Fauci, the CDC, the NIH or FDA has been made, all in the interest of Moderna and Pfizer's stock prices and the power-mad jackasses on an international basis -- at the cost of your loved ones' lives.

That wasn't an accident and it still isn't one.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)

2021-08-21 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in *****-19 , 3266 references
[Comments enabled]  

Now the CDC wants everyone to line up for a third round of clot-shot lottery.

Note carefully: The Israel data says this will fail and kill lots of people.

Aran’s message for the United States and other wealthier nations considering boosters is stark: “Do not think that the boosters are the solution.”

That's right.  They're not.

Delta may be more-transmissible but if you're immune it does not matter how transmissible a virus is.  You either can or cannot be infected.  It's binary.  If you're immune then you're immune.  If you're not then you're not.  If you have had Chicken Pox (I have) you'd look at anyone telling you to take a chicken pox shot as if they had six heads because such a suggestion is flat-out bat****-crazy-level insanity.

The idea that somehow Delta "can" break through immunity because it is more transmissible is flat-out scientific fraud and everyone who says that and has any knowledge of viruses and immunity knows it.  They're lying, on purpose, and every one of them deserves to be locked up in GITMO as a ****ing terrorist and waterboarded to within an inch of their lives.

The reason Delta is "breaking through" is either due to OAS or the fact that the *******s never did work worth a crap in the first place to prevent you from getting infected.  Their "efficacy" was a lie but whether its due to mutational reality or the fact that we claimed "effectiveness" simply due to herd effects with the existing circulating strains at the time does not matter.

My suspicion is that there is a blend of both going on here and there is science to back that up; the mutational pattern that we have seen and the science behind it says that evasion is happening.  The "wild coding" used originally and to this day for the jabs is long-extinct; there is basically zero of that circulating anymore in the population.  It has all been subsumed by ordinary mutational process and we had every reason to believe this would happen when *****-19 first showed up because it has happened with every other coronavirus we have studied through history -- including the closest analog SARS-1 which mutated itself out of transmission and being a threat to people.

This is much like what happens with the flu shot every year: They have to guess which specific flu strains and mutations will show up in advance.  They're never right.  Their match varies in effectiveness but is basically never 100%.  Get it (sort of) right, you get decent protection.  Get it wrong you get little or nothing.

Except: Every coronavirus in history has mutated at a high rate in the spike domain.  All of them.  We knew this and we ALSO knew before the first shot went into the first arm the strain against which the *******s were developed -- all of them -- was extinct in the wild, having been out-competed by said mutations.

We lied about the effectiveness by taking advantage of a peak in infections for the circulating strains last winter that was already in the past.  It was a knowing, intentional lie used to get 150+ million Americans to do something with waning toward worthless effectiveness but with 100x higher risk than the ordinary flu shot or, for that matter, any other ******* in history.

The match has continued to degrade; it is biologically impossible to win that "arms race" as the virus will continue to change, and attempting to jab people with repeat inoculations as the match gets worse and worse over time simply adds to the risk of serious adverse events including clotting, strokes and heart damage.   Note that despite knowing this there has been no change made to the formulations.  What are you going to do -- throw all the existing doses and pipeline for them in the trash every time a new mutation shows up?

What we did was fight a war that cannot be won by the means employed and any honest person knows it.  The entire ****ing government and medical apparatus knew this, lied about it and continues to lie today.  All of them.

They KNOW they're full of ****.

Rather than accept this fact and focus our attention on determining the most-effective ways to interdict infections early in people with a goal of allowing the infection to course its way through the population while not killing the victims or sending them to the hospital we instead took an utterly insane approach that focused on the idea that we could prevent people from getting the virus at all.  Whether that was masks (worthless since the virus is a tiny fraction of the size of the filter media and goes right through it), lockdowns (pointless; all you do is delay the inevitable) and now *******s we keep being beaten around the head and shoulders by the virus which follows the laws of physics and undergoes natural mutation whether we like it or not.

I believed I might have had *****-19 in January of 2020, even though I tested negative for antibodies several months later.  As it turns out my later antibody testing (negative) was correct and not a defective test; whatever I had in January of 2020 it was not *****-19.

But now having had *****-19 (almost-certainly Delta too) and knowing damn well it was *****-19, and surviving it, it is a clearly-distinct infection that I could not possibly mistake for anything else.  That I was infected with *****-19 is known scientific fact as I was previously IgG negative as of a couple months ago but now, following recovery from said suspected infection, am IgG positive.

Having had the infection and now having found IgG antibodies by test I am now known robustly immune to any and all variants; the immunity built from natural infection is conserved across the various epitopes of the virus in all cases because the "N" portion of the virus, which has to remain more-or-less intact for it to be able to be a virus, forms the backbone and bulk of the immune response built following natural infection.

I am not afraid of *****-19 at any level any longer.  I am the exact person you want to employ to work in a hospital or nursing home full of very high-risk persons for severe *****-19 because I am sterile to the virus; I can neither get it or give it to anyone.  Of course we would have to negotiate terms; money is not, I suspect, among the ones hospitals and nursing homes would have trouble with.

This is not true for any of the *******s, it was a critical error in what we did and it is why we are now seeing escape.  It is not breakthrough folks, it is escape due to mismatch between the coded antibodies and circulating virus and it will both continue and accelerate as the match inexorably continues to degrade between what circulates and the original "wild type" out of Wuhan, which is what's coded in ALL the jabs and which is long extinct.  What's worse is that if OAS or ADE really come out to play on top of it then if you have not been naturally infected and have been jabbed you are in for a world of **** if you get challenged by the virus in the wild.  Even very, very small enhancement percentages from ADE-style reactions can completely overwhelm any sort of treatment possibility at all.

We do not yet know if this is happening as we are deliberately not autopsying and investigating cases where someone was vaccinated, got infected anyway and then rapidly crashed going from being moderately ill to in an ICU or dead within 72 hours.  There are multiple reports of this happening already.  If this was someone who had a defective immune response then that's very unfortunate but it does happen.  We had damned well better prove that, however, and we're not going the pathology work to do so.  If it turns out that said person did in fact build a proper immune response then these cases are either OAS or ADE-enhanced disease and while this outcome is clearly not universal in those who got jabbed if it is happening even once in a while we had better figure it out right ****ing now or there is going to be a pile of dead bodies this fall and winter and it will be the direct responsibility of those who advocated for and in fact are trying to, in many cases, FORCE mass-jabbing of the population that caused it.

View this entry with comments (opens new window)

2021-08-02 07:00 by Karl Denninger
in *****-19 , 42651 references
[Comments enabled]  

I warned everyone.

Now even CNN is on it, although they (like SAGE) think we're smarter than nature -- and evolution.

They write that some variants that have emerged over the past few months "show a reduced susceptibility to *******-acquired immunity, though none appears to escape entirely."

But they caution that these variants emerged "before vaccination was widespread," and that "as *******s become more widespread, the transmission advantage gained by a virus that can evade *******-acquired immunity will increase."

In a word: Duh.

I know I've been banging on this drum since *****-19 started but it is no-less important today, especially in the context of holding people accountable for killing several hundred thousand Americans and the economic destruction they brought upon the nation.

To be sterilizing a ******* must prevent infection.  Since you never get infected you never replicate the virus and thus do not shed it.  If you do not shed it the potential path of the viral life-cycle for that particular infection ends with you and thus you cannot pass on or cause a mutation. You are sterile against that disease; from the point of view of the virus you are a lifeless rock.  Among commonly-used sterilizing *******s are MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), Varicella (chicken pox), OPV (oral polio) and others.  The only time that such a ******* fails is when you do not build immunity (such as due to immune compromise.)  This is extremely rare and the protection from such *******s tends to be either decades-long or lifetime.

A ******* that is not sterilizing permits the virus to infect you and replicate and as a result you can infect others.  Technically it is not a ******* at all (which by definition prevents infection); it is a prophylactic therapy.  Such a "*******" instead acts to reduce or eliminate symptomatic disease.  You don't know you're sick and you don't get sick.  You don't go to the hospital and you don't die.  Unfortunately since you don't know you're sick but are infected and the virus is both replicating in you and shedding you are more-likely to spread the infection to others.  All of the current ***** jabs are in this category and so is, for that matter IPV (injected polio ******* -- the original Salk discovery.)

During the original ******* trials in the summer and fall of 2020 they deliberately did not test any of the recipients for asymptomatic infections.  Only a person who developed a significant illness was tested.  This has continued post roll-out with the CDC specifying that a close contact of a known case who was vaccinated did not need to quarantine or be tested until and unless they became symptomatic.  They knew damn well, in other words, that the jabs were not sterilizing but did not want that data up for public debate because then those who have read history would be likely to make the connection to the present day and thus they did their level best to hide it.  That has now blown up in their face with it being conclusively known that jabbed people in fact not only get infected but spread the virus to others.

The problem with non-sterilizing *******s is simply this: There is no safe means of mass-use of non-sterilizing *******s so long as transmission within the community does or is likely to exist.


There are no exceptions.

This was known to public health officials and virologists seventy years ago and is why the United States used both IPV (injected polio *******) and OPV (oral polio *******) in sequence for polio until the 1990s.  OPV produced sterilizing immunity but IPV did not.  OPV had a very small (but non-zero, about 1 in a million) risk of causing polio because it was a codon-deoptimized live virus which, on rare occasion, would mutate back to its virulent form in the human body.  So to mitigate that risk you got IPV first in the US (to prevent systemic infection; this was non-sterilizing), then OPV which is sterilizing -- that is, it prevents not only getting sick from polio but also replicating and shedding the virus, thus giving it to others along with preventing the promotion of mutations that WILL eventually escape the *******.

Had we done with polio what we're doing now with ***** -- IPV (non-sterilizing) use only with virus circulating in the United States -- it is very likely the virus would have mutated, escaped the ******* and killed millions in America.  Every single so-called expert knows damn well why we didn't do that with polio and how dangerous it is to attempt it.  Indeed where polio still circulates but money is scarce they use OPV only (which is sterilizing) and accept the risk of the rare but possible active case it can cause for this exact reason.

Again: This is not a "new idea"; it was in fact the only rational path of action and known decades ago, forming the very basis of our polio vaccination strategy.  This combination strategy was necessary for polio but not for measles, for example, as the measles ******* is sterilizing.



In addition natural infection with *****-19 is sterilizing.  Being infected and recovering conserves the nasal and respiratory mucosal response which is where the virus enters the body.  Natural infection also conveys both "N" (nucleocapsid) and "S" (spike) antibody knowledge and T-cell recognition but the "N" knowledge is much stronger as coronaviruses have evolved to evade the immune system with the "S" portion through millions of years.  This is why they can infect you in the first place.  The "S" portion undergoes mutation at a quite-rapid rate while the "N" portion is conserved.  It was thus expected that prior infection would lead to durable (years to decades) of resistance and indeed that's exactly what we have found thus far.  Indeed in a small study it was found that this recognition extended to the bone marrow in a large percentage of cases and in those people is likely to confer decades-long if not lifetime protection.  This is not true for "S" induced immunity as it wanes rapidly and, far worse that is where the mutation is taking place and thus where escape risk lies.

It was acceptable to issue EUAs for potentially non-sterilizing jabs to be used only by very high-risk individuals -- such as those in nursing homes -- with the understanding that they will fail to provide anywhere close to complete protection and might, over time potentiate worse outcomes.  But with actual informed consent and on a limited, not population-wide basis, that was defensible.  This, of course, leaves aside the adverse event risk -- which we also know is much higher in these jabs, by a factor of 100x or more, than we have ever tolerated in any mass-use shot before.

It was ridiculously and grossly negligent entering into the territory of depraved indifference to mass-vaccinate the population with non-sterilizing jabs.  We knew very early on that eradicating *****-19 was impossible; there are animal reservoirs, specifically felines (of all sorts), ferrets and likely others (now believed to include deer.)  We have never eradicated rabies and never will for this reason; as long as there are animal reservoirs you cannot eradicate a virus as it always has a host and a means of transmission outside of human control.

As such there was never, and will never be, a safe means to use non-sterilizing *******s against this virus or any other coronavirus and the more jabs we deliver and attempt to compel the use of the worse the problem will get.

Eventually we are very likely to get a mutation that entirely evades the jabs.  That mutation will be caused by those who are jabbed since they are the only ones placing such mutational pressure on the virus.  An unvaccinated person who gets infected places no such mutational pressure on the virus where a vaccinated person not only does they provide the exact pathway that virologists use to intentionally select for more-transmissible, virile or both mutations -- serial passage through cells that does not kill the host.

What is potentially worse is that there is a developing body of evidence that those who previously had ***** and then get vaccinated may destroy their "N" protein recognition by doing so, ruining their previous nearly-perfect immunity.  That we did not specifically prove that this did not happen before giving these shots to anyone with prior infection is outrageous.  While the data on this is quite thin at present that there is a higher breakthrough rate in persons with prior infection than those who were infected but did not get vaccinated is what the data currently shows, which strongly implies that vaccination after infection actually screws you.

The people who did all of this did so intentionally either by willful blindness or worse, with actual knowledge -- and the so-called "public health" authorities who continue to push this instead of banning it are intentionally doing so as well.  Vander**** is just one example of this insanity but hardly alone -- Johns Hopkins, Harvard, Mayo, Cleveland -- they all know this is true, never mind the researchers at Ft. Detrick, the CDC and NIH.

Until and unless we prove a ******* against ***** (or anything else that is circulating) is sterilizing it cannot be safely used on a mass-population basis.  That's the beginning and end of the discussion.  There are no exceptions, ever, period.  This was not even attempted to be demonstrated in the summer and fall 2020 ***** ******* trials as the time period was too short to do so.  We now know, factually that in fact there are zero sterilizing and effective options among the *******s in use -- whether here in the US or otherwise.

The only means to combat a pathogen absent sterilizing vaccination is to hit infections early and hard with whatever you have for the purpose of reducing viral load so as to produce durable, sterilizing immunity via infection.  If you reduce viral load you reduce both the risk of pathology seriously injuring or killing the infected person and also reduce the forward transmission rate, Rt, of said virus. 

Only sterilizing immunity cuts off mutation and exerting mutational pressure via non-sterilizing *******s not only promotes mutation by removing the signal an infected person has to self-isolate and reduce transmission risk (since you don't feel ill) it nudges the virus toward codons that will escape the protection in whole or part.

In small groups of particularly high risk a non-sterilizing ******* may be worth it but any use of one raises the risk of mutational escape and thus while attempting to protect that small group you may screw others.  Attempting to accurately determine who "deserves" to get protected while someone else gets screwed is a discussion that damn well ought to take place out in public as it is the public at large that is the recipient of the screwing if it occurs!

There remains a risk that drug resistance may arise which is why multi-drug regimes are important.  As an example HCQ+Ivermectin which was formally registered as a trial and then never actually run, is (among other options) one such potential approach.

When it comes to respiratory viruses as was the case with polio you need immunity via whatever source to take hold at the point of both entry and emission by an infected person.  This is why OPV worked on a sterilizing basis for polio where IPV did not.  IPV was injected; OPV was consumed.  As a result OPV produced mucosal immunity in the gut and thus prevented both colonization and forward transmission.  IPV, on the other hand, prevented symptomatic disease in the person immunized but did not express sufficiently in the gut mucosa to prevent infection, shedding and transmission.


If you get ***** and beat it since the point of entry is your respiratory mucosa you have strong and broad resistance focused there.  That's sterilizing in more than 9 out of 10 persons and far more-durable than jab-based immunity as well.  That is what the data tells us. 

It is wildly superior to a non-sterilizing ******* because you are not only very unlikely to get the virus again you are also nearly-certain to be unable to infect anyone else if you do.  This and only this is what cuts off mutational pressure.

It's too late now; we're stuck with the stupid, particularly all the screaming harpies who went out and got jabbed despite being at very low risk of serious outcomes themselves, turning themselves into literal gain-of-function labs for the virus.  If you took the jab, in short, unless you were at very high risk and thus it was justified on a personal mitigation basis you are, in fact, part of the body of individuals that are placing evolutionary pressure on the virus to evolve and ultimately evade the protection and screw not just others but you as well.

Those who are claiming "well, I got jabbed, I got infected, but it would have been much worse if I didn't get jabbed" are the worst of the psychotics.  First, the majority of *****-19 infections are asymptomatic according to the CDC itself.  Indeed they claim at least six people get infected for each detected infection.  You may well have moved yourself from "I sneezed" to "I got pretty damned sick" by taking the shot.  You don't know.  But worse is that by taking the jab and then getting infected anyway you have now not just become a potential mutational factory you are one of the people causing what will ultimately become viral escape and the screwing of yourself and others because by definition if you got sick after vaccination the virus got into your system, it has now proved whatever occurred in you evaded the protection you had and then was emitted back out where others can catch it from you after that evasion took place.

You were either the mutational factory or an intermediate host that screws the next person you share the love with!

Not only did your protection against fail but, much worse, it's possible that said screwing will be enhanced by whatever residual antibody titer you may have since binding antibodies, if present (and which you intentionally put into your system) will still be present.  Even more-seriously you put the spike protein and thus the antibody response not in your nose and throat but in your blood vessels and other organs where they can cause the exact disease progression that occurs when *****-19 kills people.  If you get a "break though" infection I hope you have your d-Dimer levels immediately checked because if not you may be a walking heart attack or stroke somewhere in the not-so-distant future with no other warning as a direct result of intentionally loading your body full of "protection" in the wrong place.

This, and only this, is why I will not consent to such a jab under any circumstances until and unless there is hard science showing that a sterilizing option exists.  That one, assuming the risk profile is reasonable, is one I might consider.  Said jab today does not exist anywhere in the United States and I'm unaware of any scientific work showing that any of the current jabs are sterilizing irrespective of where they are manufactured and sold.

Without sterilizing immunization against this disease the only sane approach is to attempt to interdict the progress of disease at first suspicion and evidence of infection instead.

I am capable of reading both history and scientific papers, I know I'm right, the CDC, NIH, Vander****, Mayo, Cleveland and Johns Hopkins also knew for decades that I'm right and they have either all turned what formerly were scientific organizations into politically-driven soy-boy pieces of worthless and even harmful crap or, much worse, they're deliberately lying.

If you were among the conned the only remaining question is what are you going to do with and to those who conned you?

Stay tuned for the next exciting episode of "You're ****ed, fool."

View this entry with comments (opens new window)