The Market Ticker
Commentary on The Capital Markets- Category [Market Musings]
2016-02-11 09:46 by Karl Denninger
in Market Musings , 429 references
 

Just a little birdie whispering for you, but there's a very nice 1600 target that appears to be greatly increasing in the probability of being hit.

Don't ask what the target is if that doesn't hold.

You won't like the answer.

PS: First mentioned on a private group I run quite a while ago..... the pattern appears to remain in-play despite all the screaming by people like Cramer.....

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

And so it begins today.

Chesapeake Energy, one of Cramer's former darlings if you remember, had been down some 30% last month.

Today it lost nearly half its tiny remaining value on reports of restructuring.  You see, this company, like so many others, took on a bunch of debt over the last few years -- and unfortunately has a $500 million note due soon.

Oh, did I mention that while they supposedly have the money it would cripple them to pay it out considering that their levered free cash flow is negative $2.52 billion and their total debt is more than five times their cash?

Oops.

Of course you ought to buy companies like Amazon and Facebook because they don't have said debt load and a looming coupon payment, but they do have P/Es that remain, even after their recent selloffs, in the stratosphere.

There's really nothing like losing a third of your money in a month, then another 40% in a morning, and, to top it off, you can then rotate what's left of your formerly-large pile of cash into tech stocks at 1,000 times earnings and lose 90% of the remainder.

For anyone who has forgotten the "sell side" folks (including Cramer) are experts at leading you into this sort of self-destruction; go back and read this piece if you need to and figure out how much of your money you'd have left if you went into those names at that time, and how fast the destruction came.  Pay very careful attention to the date of that missive.....

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

2016-02-04 11:20 by Karl Denninger
in Market Musings , 1464 references
 

This is arithmetic, not politics or "market structure" or anything else of the sort.

The last 30+ years have driven the S&P 500 from approximately 100 in 1980 to 1900 today.  This is commonly reported as being due to increasing sales and earnings, that is, a "larger economy" and "better efficiency."

But that is, for the most part, a lie.

Oh sure, there is a kernel of truth in it, and that truth is responsible for some of the growth.  Maybe a doubling, tripling or even quadrupling between all of if -- after all, population has gone up in the United States by a cumulative 1% annually, for example, and there has been a very material expansion in overseas trade and economic improvement.

But the rest of the nineteen-fold expansion didn't come from there.

It came from this:

If I borrowed $1 million dollars for 10 years in 1980, and was as good a credit risk as the US Government, I had to come up with about $150,000 a year to service that debt.  That is, I could keep that million dollars forever but to do so I had to generate $150,000 in free cash flow each and every year to do so -- and that $150,000 could not be spent on anything else.

But by 1990, when the debt rolled over, I only had to come up with $75,000.  The other alternative was to keep coming up with the $150,000 a year but to borrow and spend another million dollars.  Guess what most firms -- and the government -- did?  The credit growth numbers tell the story.

This pattern continued; today, as I write this, the 10 year Treasury yields 1.865%, which means that I can borrow about eight times as much money and keep it out for the same $150,000 that I could have borrowed in 1980.

That's what drove the stock market.

Now here's the important part: The market prices in forward expectations -- not today's "value."

Today the market believes this pattern will continue.  But it cannot; negative interest rates at central banks are in fact deflationary; they do not drive increased borrowing because the cash that is deposited by the borrower or held by lenders is effectively taxed by said negative rate; that is, instead of increasing the amount of "moneyness" in the economy it is confiscated instead.

Negative rates serve to attempt to coerce spending rather than investment and thus increase velocity.  However, that is immaterial to what drove the market's price appreciation and that cannot be promoted further; for short-term money the effective rate is already zero and as such only time preference remains which will never completely disappear.

Even if rates do not normalize the increased borrowing is what drove appreciation.  That increase has now come to an end, and the bursting of the housing bubble occurred because when rate decreases stopped happening at a rate that was sufficient to maintain the "rollover" behavior banks and others substituted ignoring credit quality.  This is a guaranteed way to lose money because an unqualified borrower obviously won't pay, but if you can manage to avoid going to prison, and lots of political arm-twisting accomplished that, you can steal "the last meal" from the "peasants" (that's you and I, by the way.)

Unfortunately that truly was the last meal.  The amount of time it will take for markets to recognize this will vary from place to place; China, for example, is still playing the "hide the rotting fish" game as is Europe and, to some degree, the United States, but again that's a timing matter rather than an outcome issue.

The outcome is not in doubt because arithmetic just is.

The stress this time is showing up first in natural resources (e.g. oil and shipping) companies but at its core the problem is in the financial system because essentially all of these projects are (or rather "were") financed at or near 100% "coverage" assuming the price of oil and/or shipping would not fall and thus the operating cash flow would be sufficient.

But the price didn't just fall, it collapsed.

None of these debts are covered, and we're now arguing over how long it takes before the cash flow insufficiency starts to create losses that cannot be hidden and bankrupt not only the borrowers but those holding the paper who have used it to lever up other bets by using it as collateral.

This isn't 2007 -- it is in fact much worse because it's global rather than being concentrated in subprime housing in the United States.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

Without comment......

other than the striking resemblance to another chart which failed to recover in '08-09....

Did someone's attempt to paper over the dead fish stench finally come unglued?

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

smiley

The day approaches when the sign goes up.....

Incidentally, look at Sprint if you want a clue to what happens to those who take a lot of debt and do silly things.  A stock that I really liked (and strongly recommended) a few years ago, made plenty of money on, and then got out of when Softbank got involved, well..... from ~$9 to $2.64, how's it going, jackass?

Singular example?  Uh uh....

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

Main Navigation
MUST-READ Selection:
Convention Of States?

Full-Text Search & Archives
Archive Access


Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media or for commercial use.

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.