The Market Ticker
Commentary on The Capital Markets- Category [Market Musings]

There was one lesson today from the FOMC decision.

The Fed downgraded their economic forecast.  The market, in response, shot up 50 handles on the S&P and four hundred DOW points from where it was before the announcement.

What this tells you is, quite simply, this:

ALL of the market's upward move is a consequence of uneconomic decisions made by firms.

It is not due to growth.

It is not due to organic profits.

It is not due to an improving economy.

It IS due to borrowing to buy back stock and other leveraging games, all of which are Ponzi schemes.

And this will end exactly as it did in 2000 and 2008, Larry Kudlow's chortling notwithstanding.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

This sort of story makes me chuckle.

Share repurchases by the S&P 500 corporations totaled a staggering $2.1 trillion from Q1-2009 through the latest available data, for Q3-2014. Over the same period through Q4-2014, these companies paid dividends of $1.6 trillion. Many investors tend to reinvest dividends in the stock market. The S&P 500 has been highly correlated with the sum of these two cash flows.

S&P 500 corporations have had an incentive to buy back their shares ever since 2004, when corporate bond yields consistently fell below the forward earnings yield of the composite.

In other words companies haven't been buying back stock with cash, they've been doing it by borrowing money.

That sounds ok when the corporate bond yield cost is below the forward earnings yield but that's a chimera because borrowed money has to be either repaid or rolled over and when used for a buyback there is no productivity increase that comes from the borrowing.

When you borrow money to build a new plant provided that plant produces enough free cash flow to both service and retire the debt before it comes due the net impact is often positive.  You grow the business and the hit to operating margins occasioned by the interest and principal is temporary; when the bond matures and is paid off (or if you are able to call it early) you retain the forward cash flow from operating the new plant in its entirety.

But when you buy back stock the only change is a temporary increase in EPS, provided everything else stays the same.  That EPS increase, however, is diluted by the carrying cost (interest) and when the principal is due you are exposed to either the requirement to pay the principal or roll the bond, and you have no control over the rollover rate and whether it will be "reasonable" in your view at that time.

When you "take advantage" of machined interest rates that have been forced downward so the government can deficit spend willy-nilly you are, as an executive, betting that this situation will never end.  But such is impossible, as is infinite exponential growth.  Neither can continue forever, and nobody can determine with any sort of certainty exactly when those conditions will reverse.

When it does all of that "excess" EPS, and thus your "excess" share price, will all come back out -- and more.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

This is a rather amusing tape.

As I write this the Dow is down 280, the S&P off 30 handles and the Nasdaq 54.

But -- and this is important -- the U/D volume is not all that wide, and the TRIN for the NYSE is actually under 1.0 with the Nasdaq TRIN just over 1 at 1.04.

This is not congruent with a big decline.

The 10 year yield, on the other hand, is up 6% -- that's big.  The 5-year bond yield is up 7.8%, which is an extraordinarily-violent move.

What to make of all that?  This certainly isn't a decline to short into (it was a good one to short right up front!) but there's also no indication of panic -- which means it's damn dangerous to try to buy it too.

Were I inclined to do something here (I'm not) I'd sit and wait.... and see who got in trouble, particularly in the highly-levered world where some bond and currency traders like to live.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

LinkedIn has seen quite a run of late in its stock price.

I killed my profile there a couple of years ago because the company was famous for spamming me, literally on a daily basis, with dozens of so-called "I want to add you to my professional network" invites.

Virtually every single one of these was identical down to the last letter.

In other words, exactly none of these were actually people asking me to be part of their network.

No, they were spam.  They were LinkedIn scanning someone's email address book and, finding my email address in there, sending me said "invitation" unsolicited.

How does LinkedIn get around the anti-spamming laws?  You "opted in" when you created an account.

But here's the thing -- all of these so-called "connections" that LinkedIn claims they have "found" for you which forms the entire predicate on which the firm has any value whatsoever, are false.

I might have exchanged emails with 30 or 50% of these people over the last few years, but I can literally count the number of them that I actually know in a contemporary professional context on the fingers of my hands.

It gets worse -- once you have "confirmed" such a person as a member of your "network" they then can "endorse" you for various skills and experience.  And you will be endorsed for same -- by people with utterly no professional basis to make such a claim.

Why do I bring this up now?  Beyond the outrageous ramp-job in LinkedIn's share price I recently got one of these "invitations" even though I didn't have a LinkedIn profile from someone who I really do know.  I thought perhaps that was "real", so I turned a profile back on -- and within hours I got dozens of additional "add me to my network" requests.

Folks, you gotta be kidding me.  And let me be quite clear -- any so-called "generic" invitation from people in general will get ash-canned immediately.  I have no purpose in trying to establish a brag list of people who I allegedly "am networked with" via this or any other form of "social media."

Further, if you got (or receive in the future) such an "invitation" from me you didn't get it as a result of my letting LinkedIn have access to my address book because I not only didn't give it to them they can't get it via third parties as there is only one place it resides -- on my servers, resting on encrypted storage.  I assure you I also did not go through a list of "potential" connections and click the "invite" button either; if you ever see such an invitation from me it will be unmistakably customized so you know I personally sent it.

This is a company selling at 15x sales and over 60 times projected forward earnings -- and which has a current posted EPS loss, all built on the predicate of spamming people (for real -- these are unsolicited emails both from the standpoint of the recipient and alleged sender) to "build their professional networks."

But there's no bubble in Nasdaq and the market in general, they say.

Uh huh.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)

Main Navigation
MUST-READ Selection:
The Search For Unicorns

Full-Text Search & Archives
Archive Access
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.


The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media or for commercial use.

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.