The Market Ticker
Commentary on The Capital Markets- Category [Market Musings]

Beware the tricks in your bag today....

Today’s decision to expand Japan’s monetary stimulus may be regarded as shock treatment in the central bank’s effort to affect confidence levels.

Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda’s remedy to reflate the world’s third-largest economy through influencing expectations saw the yen sliding and stocks climbing. Kuroda led a divided board in Tokyo in a surprise decision to expand unprecedented monetary stimulus.

Remember, folks, QE works.

It works so well that it has be repeated.  Time and time again.  Every time.  All the time.

Where's the exit for Japan?  Two decades in coming, and yet here we still are, needing evermore.

What you got out of this was a big (~2%!) move in the Yen -- weaker.  That of course translated into a big move northbound in the futures.  Remember that a collapsing currency results in a skyrocketing stock market priced in that currency, but whether this is "good" depends on whether you can eat your (electronic) shares.

Given this enormous move (weaker) in the Yen would you mind explaining where the inflation is that the BOJ wants to see?  Since it has not materialized perhaps you might also muse on exactly what the impact of this "program" actually is.

And that's the paradox, you see -- despite the outrageously-large move in the Yen over the last few years there has been no inflation to be found in Japan itself -- at least as measured from the government's point of view, and thus what has been reported.  But that there's no reported inflation does not mean that your standard of living improved.  One need only look here where there has been essentially no inflation over the last several years either (as reported by the government) and square that with the median family income numbers, or for that matter other periods of time here in America, to see that these so-called reported numbers mean exactly bupkis when it comes to whether your net purchasing power, as measured in the goods and services you can buy with an hour of labor, have improved or deteriorated.

So what's to come for Japan?

Hint: If you're a Japanese citizen I hope you enjoy grabbing your ankles.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

2014-10-31 06:01 by Karl Denninger
in Market Musings , 130 references
 

Yeah, this is smart....

Another quarterly earnings report, another slam dunk for Facebook. The company made $3.2 billion in the third quarter, up 59 percent year-over-year, and grew to 1.35 billion monthly active users. More than 700 million people check Facebook on their phones every single day. These are impressive numbers. But Facebook is about to toy with the hearts and minds of investors, shareholders, and analysts by spending the next year investing heavily in its passion projects: WhatsApp, Oculus, and Internet.org.

Really?  Slam-dunk?  Like Spamazon?

Well, sure.  Why not?  As long as investors will put up with executives paying themselves billions via either cash or (worse) "buybacks" (that are not really buybacks, because the stock is not canceled -- it is instead put in the Treasury and then used to pay executives) while the firm returns zippo in dividends and earns no net profit, what's to deter this behavior?

The oddity in this isn't that it happens.  It's that traders and "investors" (if there are any left) sit back and allow it while holding their shares, permitting Bezos and Zuckerburgler to loot them under the guise of "future investment."

Uh huh.  Amazon has run this line of crap now for more than a decade sequentially and gotten away with it, so why not?  As long as Bezos can walk on water, who cares?  As long as Zuckerburgler can do so, who cares?

Well, obviously, not you and not I.  I find it utterly amazing -- and amusing -- that the so-called analyst community continues to give this sort of crap a pass as well, but I guess I shouldn't be.

After all, so long as there's someone standing around willing to bid up yet another zero-net business (FaceBook has a P/E of nearly 70, and Amazon's is negative) why, if you're an executive, should you not keep taking cash from the idgits that insist on shoving it into your hand?

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

No, this is not a crash call.

It is, however, a warning - that you should beware of the conditions that have preceded severe market dislocations before, be aware of them, pay attention to them, and contemplate whether it is worth being involved in the market at this particular time.

Market dislocations come from many causes but have one common precursor -- over-extension of credit (margin debt) that must be rapidly unwound.  The are seeded in an environment that is generally volatile in the negative direction, thus exposing a greater percentage of those positions to margin calls.  They are usually accompanied by or associated with an expiration of one or more instruments that provide alleged "protection" against such volatility, where the cost of their replacement is high.  

The precise trigger for the event itself is usually analyzed in the wreckage that follows with all sorts of books and papers, yet the fact is that none of those are more than a guess.  In 2000 a little dog-crap public firm (that incidentally still exists!) was, to the best of my ability, the triggering event -- they announced a restatement at an inauspicious time.  2008 was of course blamed on Lehman, but in fact Lehman was a symptom, not the problem itself.

Every night someone wakes up in a cold sweat and pushes the flatten button.  Someone else wakes up with delusions of grandeur in their eyes and mashes the buy it all button.  

The dislocation itself happens when a lot of the first group show up at once and few or none of the latter do, and then the phone starts to ring on the desk (or in the hand, nowdays) of all the people who didn't mash that flatten button -- and they've got a big fat margin loan out that has now driven their account into negative equity. 

Cascade selling comes from people who are told they must sell because the margin clerk is on line #1 and he's just advised you that if you do not deliver good funds to him within the next hour you will be forcibly liquidated and, if you still have a debit balance, they will next lien all your assets, including in most states your house.

I will note that despite all the crying and screaming in the last two of three days, and the elation during one of them post Fed minutes, the conditions are not ripe, at this particular moment, for that to happen.  It doesn't mean it can't, just that it's not all that likely that today is the day.  I can no more see into people's bedrooms at 3:00 AM than can you.

But -- and this is the point to consider -- the fact that such events come not from a market that is "topping" but one that has started to decline and where volatility is rising means that the time to contemplate saying "That wisp of smoke may mean the curtains are on fire" is not the day before the event, believe it or not.

If you wait until then you're probably 10, maybe 20% off where you should have sold and gotten out.  You gave that up simply based on hope and hype, and the difficulty of selling in that environment when you're that far down from where the pretty number on your screen said you were (all fake money, by the way, until you sell) is well-understood. 

It's hard to bail on a position that's 10 or 20% down from where it was.  It's even harder to bail on an entire portfolio that's down 10 or 20%.  The simple fact is that it is a near-certainty that if you wait until that happens you probably won't bail at all and thus you'll take the entire ride down or far worse, sell at the bottom in the depths of panic.

And that's the best argument for doing it before that pattern -- and the decline from that top occurs, especially if you've got positions that are up 20, 50, or even 100% or more over the last couple of years.

Pigs get slaughtered.

View this entry with comments (registration required to post)
 

Main Navigation
Full-Text Search & Archives
Archive Access
Get Adobe Flash player
Legal Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided without any warranty, express or implied. All opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions.

NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, OPTIONS, BONDS OR FUTURES.

The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis, opinion or advertisement on this site are your sole responsibility.

Market charts, when present, used with permission of TD Ameritrade/ThinkOrSwim Inc. Neither TD Ameritrade or ThinkOrSwim have reviewed, approved or disapproved any content herein.

The Market Ticker content may be reproduced or excerpted online for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given and the original article source is linked to. Please contact Karl Denninger for reprint permission in other media or for commercial use.

Submissions or tips on matters of economic or political interest may be sent "over the transom" to The Editor at any time. To be considered for publication your submission must include full and correct contact information and be related to an economic or political matter of the day. All submissions become the property of The Market Ticker.